A comparison of the consistency of proteome quantitation using two-dimensional electrophoresis and shotgun isobaric tagging in Escherichia coli cells

被引:103
作者
Choe, LH [1 ]
Aggarwal, K [1 ]
Franck, Z [1 ]
Lee, KH [1 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Sch Chem & Biomol Engn, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
关键词
isobaric tag; iTRAQ; shotgun proteomics; tandem mass spectrometry; two-dimensional electrophoresis;
D O I
10.1002/elps.200410336
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
An important consideration in the measurement of quantitative changes in protein expression is the consistency of the observations for a given technique as well as the reproducibility of the experiment. A quantitative assessment of the technical and biological variability is crucial to avoid erroneous inferences and conclusions. Two methods for measuring quantitative changes in protein expression are two-dimensional electrophoresis (2-DE) and shotgun- proteomics of isobaric-tagged samples using iTRAQ (TM) reagents. An assessment of changes in Escherichia coli protein expression in response to rhsA induction demonstrates that half of the quantified protein expression ratios have a coefficent of variation (CV) less than 0.31 using 2-DE and less than 0.24 using isobaric tags; whereas 95% of the quantified protein expression ratios have a CV less than 0.81 using 2-DE and less than 0.53 using isobaric tags. The selective removal of outlier data points from the shotgun method using Grubb's and Rosner's statistical outlier tests improves the consistency of the quantitation data obtained.
引用
收藏
页码:2437 / 2449
页数:13
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
AGGARWAL K, 2005, IN PRESS PROTEOMICS
[2]   INTERLABORATORY REPRODUCIBILITY OF YEAST PROTEIN-PATTERNS ANALYZED BY IMMOBILIZED PH GRADIENT 2-DIMENSIONAL GEL-ELECTROPHORESIS [J].
BLOMBERG, A ;
BLOMBERG, L ;
NORBECK, J ;
FEY, SJ ;
LARSEN, PM ;
LARSEN, M ;
ROEPSTORFF, P ;
DEGAND, H ;
BOUTRY, M ;
POSCH, A ;
GORG, A .
ELECTROPHORESIS, 1995, 16 (10) :1935-1945
[3]   De novo peptide sequencing and quantitative profiling of complex protein mixtures using mass-coded abundance tagging [J].
Cagney, G ;
Emili, A .
NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2002, 20 (02) :163-170
[4]  
Champion KM, 2001, PROTEOMICS, V1, P1133, DOI 10.1002/1615-9861(200109)1:9<1133::AID-PROT1133>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-S
[6]   Quantitative and qualitative measure of intralaboratory two-dimensional protein gel reproducibility and the effects of sample preparation, sample load, and image analysis [J].
Choe, LH ;
Lee, KH .
ELECTROPHORESIS, 2003, 24 (19-20) :3500-3507
[7]  
Choe LH, 1999, ELECTROPHORESIS, V20, P798, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2683(19990101)20:4/5<798::AID-ELPS798>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-F
[9]   Quantitative analysis of bacterial and mammalian proteomes using a combination of cysteine affinity tags and 15N-Metabolic labeling [J].
Conrads, TP ;
Alving, K ;
Veenstra, TD ;
Belov, ME ;
Anderson, GA ;
Anderson, DJ ;
Lipton, MS ;
Pasa-Tolic, L ;
Udseth, HR ;
Chrisler, WB ;
Thrall, BD ;
Smith, RD .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2001, 73 (09) :2132-2139
[10]   Towards two-dimensional electrophoresis mapping of the cerebrospinal fluid proteome from a single individual [J].
Finehout, EJ ;
Franck, Z ;
Lee, KH .
ELECTROPHORESIS, 2004, 25 (15) :2564-2575