Trends and disparities in regionalization of pancreatic resection

被引:84
作者
Riall, Taylor S.
Eschbach, Karl A.
Townsend, Courtney M., Jr.
Nealon, William H.
Freeman, Jean L.
Goodwin, James S.
机构
[1] Univ Texas, Med Branch, Dept Surg, Galveston, TX 77555 USA
[2] Univ Texas, Med Branch, Dept Internal Med, Galveston, TX 77550 USA
关键词
pancreatic resection; volume-outcome relationship; regionalization of care;
D O I
10.1007/s11605-007-0245-5
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The current recommendation is that pancreatic resections be performed at hospitals doing > 10 pancreatic resections annually. Objective To evaluate the extent of regionalization of pancreatic resection and the factors predicting resection at high-volume centers (> 10 cases/ year) in Texas. Methods Using the Texas Hospital Inpatient Discharge Public Use Data File, we evaluated trends in the percentage of patients undergoing pancreatic resection at high- volume centers (> 10 cases/ year) from 1999 to 2004 and determined the factors that independently predicted resection at high- volume centers. Results A total of 3,189 pancreatic resections were performed in the state of Texas. The unadjusted in- hospital mortality was higher at low- volume centers ( 7.4%) compared to high- volume centers ( 3.0%). Patients resected at high- volume centers increased from 54.5% in 1999 to 63.3% in 2004 ( P= 0.0004). This was the result of a decrease in resections performed at centers doing less than five resections/ year ( 35.5% to 26.0%). In a multivariate analysis, patients who were > 75 ( OR= 0.51), female ( OR= 0.86), Hispanic ( OR= 0.58), having emergent surgery ( OR= 0.39), diagnosed with periampullary cancer ( OR= 0.68), and living > 75 mi from a high- volume center ( OR= 0.93 per 10- mi increase in distance, P< 0.05 for all OR) were less likely to be resected at high- volume centers. The odds of being resected at a high- volume center increased 6% per year. Conclusions Whereas regionalization of pancreatic resection at high- volume centers in the state of Texas has improved slightly over time, 37% of patients continue to undergo pancreatic resection at low- volume centers, with more than 25% occurring at centers doing less than five per year. There are obvious demographic disparities in the regionalization of care, but additional unmeasured barriers need to be identified.
引用
收藏
页码:1242 / 1251
页数:10
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States [J].
Birkmeyer, JD ;
Stukel, TA ;
Siewers, AE ;
Goodney, PP ;
Wennberg, DE ;
Lucas, FL .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2003, 349 (22) :2117-2127
[2]   Potential benefits of the new Leapfrog standards: Effect of process and outcomes measures [J].
Birkmeyer, JD ;
Dimick, JB .
SURGERY, 2004, 135 (06) :569-575
[3]   Relationship between hospital volume and late survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy [J].
Birkmeyer, JD ;
Warshaw, AL ;
Finlayson, SRG ;
Grove, MR ;
Tosteson, ANA .
SURGERY, 1999, 126 (02) :178-183
[4]   Regionalization of high-risk surgery and implications for patient travel times [J].
Birkmeyer, JD ;
Siewers, AE ;
Marth, NJ ;
Goodman, DC .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 290 (20) :2703-2708
[5]   Raising the bar for pancreaticoduodenectomy [J].
Birkmeyer, JD .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 9 (09) :826-827
[6]   Volume and process of care in high-risk cancer surgery [J].
Birkmeyer, John D. ;
Sun, Yating ;
Goldfaden, Aaron ;
Birkmeyer, Nancy J. O. ;
Stukel, Therese A. .
CANCER, 2006, 106 (11) :2476-2481
[7]   ROLE OF OCTREOTIDE IN THE PREVENTION OF POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS FOLLOWING PANCREATIC RESECTION [J].
BUCHLER, M ;
FRIESS, H ;
KLEMPA, I ;
HERMANEK, P ;
SULKOWSKI, U ;
BECKER, H ;
SCHAFMAYER, A ;
BACA, I ;
LORENZ, D ;
MEISTER, R ;
KREMER, B ;
WAGNER, P ;
WITTE, J ;
ZURMAYER, EL ;
SAEGER, HD ;
RIECK, B ;
DOLLINGER, P ;
GLASER, K ;
TEICHMANN, R ;
KONRADT, J ;
GAUS, W ;
DENNLER, HJ ;
WELZEL, D ;
BEGER, HG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1992, 163 (01) :125-131
[8]  
BUNKER JP, 1982, SURG CLIN N AM, V62, P657
[9]  
Cameron JL, 2006, ANN SURG, V244, P10, DOI 10.1097/01.sla.0000217673.04165.ea
[10]  
DENAVASWALT C, 2006, P60231 US CENS BUR