A framework for evaluating flood risk governance

被引:77
作者
Alexander, Meghan [1 ]
Priest, Sally [1 ]
Mees, Hannelore [2 ]
机构
[1] Middlesex Univ, Flood Hazard Res Ctr, London NW4 4BT, England
[2] Univ Antwerp, Fac Social Sci, Sint Jacobstr 2, B-2000 Antwerp, Belgium
关键词
Governance; Evaluation; Flood risk management; Resilience; Efficiency; Legitimacy; ADAPTIVE GOVERNANCE; MANAGEMENT; LEGITIMACY; RESILIENCE; OUTPUT; INPUT;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsci.2016.06.004
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Calls to strengthen flood risk governance are echoed across Europe amidst a growing consensus that floods will increase in the future. Accompanying, the pursuit of societal resilience, other normative agendas relating legitimacy (e.g. accountability and public participation), and resource efficiency, have become attached to discussions concerning flood risk governance. Whilst these represent goals against which 'success' is socially and politically judged, lacking from the literature is a coherent framework to operationalise these concepts and evaluate the degree to which these are achieved. Drawing from cross disciplinary and cross-country research conducted within the EU project STAR-FLOOD, this paper presents a framework for evaluating the extent to which flood risk governance arrangements support societal resilience, and demonstrate efficiency and legitimacy. Through empirical research in England, this paper critically reflects on the value of this approach in terms of identifying entry points to strengthen governance in the pursuit of these goals. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:38 / 47
页数:10
相关论文
共 57 条
  • [21] Adaptive Governance and Managing Resilience to Natural Hazards
    Djalante, Riyanti
    Holley, Cameron
    Thomalla, Frank
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK SCIENCE, 2011, 2 (04) : 1 - 14
  • [22] Towards a Conceptual Framework for The Study of Shifts in Modes of Environmental Governance - Experiences From The Netherlands
    Driessen, Peter P. J.
    Dieperink, Carel
    van Laerhoven, Frank
    Runhaar, Hens A. C.
    Vermeulen, Walter J. V.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY AND GOVERNANCE, 2012, 22 (03) : 143 - 160
  • [23] Governance, complexity, and resilience Introduction
    Duit, Andreas
    Galaz, Victor
    Eckerberg, Katarina
    Ebbesson, Jonas
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2010, 20 (03): : 363 - 368
  • [24] Environment Agency, 2014, WRITT EV WINT FLOODS
  • [25] Fereday J., 2006, Int J Qual Methods, V5, P80, DOI [DOI 10.1177/160940690600500107, DOI 10.1063/1.2011295]
  • [26] Fluvial flood risk in Europe in present and future climates
    Feyen, Luc
    Dankers, Rutger
    Bodis, Katalin
    Salamon, Peter
    Barredo, Jose I.
    [J]. CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2012, 112 (01) : 47 - 62
  • [27] Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses
    Folke, Carl
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2006, 16 (03): : 253 - 267
  • [28] Payments for ecosystem services in an African protected area: exploring issues of legitimacy, fairness, equity and effectiveness
    Gross-Camp, Nicole D.
    Martin, Adrian
    McGuire, Shawn
    Kebede, Bereket
    Munyarukaza, Joseph
    [J]. ORYX, 2012, 46 (01) : 24 - 33
  • [29] Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Water Framework Directive in Scotland
    Hanley, Nick
    Black, Andrew R.
    [J]. INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, 2006, 2 (02) : 156 - 165
  • [30] Legitimizing differentiated flood protection levels - Consequences of the European flood risk management plan
    Hartmann, Thomas
    Spit, Tejo
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2016, 55 : 361 - 367