Five-year outcome and predictability of soft tissue profiles when wire or rigid fixation is used in mandibular advancement surgery

被引:39
作者
Dolce, C
Hatch, JP
Van Sickels, JE
Rugh, JD
机构
[1] JHMHC, Dept Orthodont, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Dept Orthodont, Gainesville, FL USA
[3] Univ Texas, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Psychiat, San Antonio, TX 78284 USA
[4] Univ Texas, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Orthodont, San Antonio, TX USA
[5] Univ Kentucky, Coll Dent, Div Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Lexington, KY USA
[6] Univ Texas, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Orthodont, San Antonio, TX USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0889-5406(03)00446-3
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to follow the covariation of hard and soft tissue changes in Class II malocclusion subjects who received a bilateral sagittal split osteotomy. The subjects were randomized to receive wire or rigid fixation after the surgery. Subjects in the rigid group (n = 78) received 2-mm bicortical position screws, and those in the wire group (n = 49) received inferior border wires and 6 weeks of skeletal intermaxillary fixation with 24-gauge wires. Additionally, some subjects received genioplasty in both the rigid (n = 35) and the wire groups (n = 24). Soft and hard tissue profile changes were obtained from cephalometric films immediately before surgery and at various times up to 5 years postsurgery. Soft and hard tissue profile changes were referenced to a cranial-base X-Y coordinate system. Horizontal changes in mandibular incisor, lower lip, B-point, soft tissue B-point, pogonion, and soft tissue pogonion were calculated at each time. There was considerable skeletal relapse in the wire fixation group. Bivariate correlations and ratios between the hard and soft tissue changes were calculated for each time period. Hard to soft tissue correlations were the highest at the earlier times, although the ratios varied among the 4 groups. These results provide a solid basis for both short-term and long-term prediction.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 256
页数:8
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
BELL WH, 1980, SURG CORRECTION DENT, P685
[2]  
BERTOLINI F, 2000, J ADULT ORTHOD ORTHO, V15, P16
[3]   Skeletal stability after mandibular advancement with rigid versus wire fixation [J].
Dolce, C ;
Van Sickels, JE ;
Bays, RA ;
Rugh, JD .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2000, 58 (11) :1219-1227
[4]   Rigid versus wire fixation for mandibular advancement: Skeletal and dental changes after 5 years [J].
Dolce, C ;
Hatch, JP ;
Van Sickels, JE ;
Rugh, JD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2002, 121 (06) :610-619
[5]   Maintenance of soft tissue changes after rigid versus wire fixation for mandibular advancement, with and without genioplasty [J].
Dolce, C ;
Johnson, PD ;
Van Sickels, JE ;
Bays, RA ;
Rugh, JD .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 2001, 92 (02) :142-149
[6]   CONNECTIVE-TISSUE FORCES FROM MANDIBULAR ADVANCEMENT [J].
ELLIS, E ;
SINN, DP .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1994, 52 (11) :1160-1163
[7]   SOFT-TISSUE RESPONSE TO MANDIBULAR ADVANCEMENT AND GENIOPLASTY [J].
EWING, M ;
ROSS, RB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1992, 101 (06) :550-555
[8]   Psychological function in orthognathic surgical patients before and after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy with rigid and wire fixation [J].
Hatch, JP ;
Rugh, JD ;
Bays, RA ;
Van Sickels, JE ;
Keeling, SD ;
Clark, GM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1999, 115 (05) :536-543
[9]  
HERNANDEZ-ORSINI R, 1989, International Journal of Adult Orthodontics and Orthognathic Surgery, V4, P209
[10]   The psychosocial impact of orthognathic surgery: A systematic review [J].
Hunt, OT ;
Johnston, CD ;
Hepper, PG ;
Burden, DJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2001, 120 (05) :490-496