Comparison of adenosine to dipyridamole in degree of coronary hyperemic response in heart transplant recipients

Transplant coronary vasculopathy is associated with endothelial dysfunction, Microvascular function, assessed as coronary flow reserve, has been reported to be normal. We used intracoronary ultrasound technology to simultaneously assess conductance and resistance vessel function in response to standard dosages of the vasodilators adenosine and dipyridamole. Coronary hemodynamic changes were assessed in 11 heart transplant recipients, at a mean duration of 784 +/- 516 days after transplantation, using a 3.2Fr or 4.3Fr, 30-MHz ultrasound imaging catheter over a 0.014-inch Doppler guidewire. Measures of coronary average peak flow velocity (APV) and coronary cross-sectional area (CSA) were used to calculate volumetric flow during intravenous infusions of adenosine (140 mu g/kg/min over 4 minutes) and dipyridamole (140 mu g/kg/min over 4 minutes). Flow reserve was assessed as a ratio of maximal pharmacologically induced flow to steady baseline flow before infusion. Increase in APV (261.9% vs 194.6%, p = 0.005), lumenal CSA (+ 11.8% vs + 4.2%, p = 0.01), peak volumetric brood flow (515.8 vs 317.2 ml/min, p = 0.007), and coronary flow reserve (2.93 +/- 0.74 vs 1.99 +/- 0.53, p < 0.001) were higher with adenosine than dipyridamole. Both agents caused similar decreases in systemic blood pressure and little change in heart rate. Adenosine appears to be a more potent coronary vasodilator than dipyridamole in denervated human transplant subjects. Adenosine haj a vasodilator effect at the epicardial and microvascular levels, resulting in an overall increase in volumetric flow. Flow reserve in response to both endothelium-independent agents is decreased in comparison with previously established values, but the attenuation is greater with dipyridamole.