Risk-adjusted morbidity in teaching hospitals correlates with reported levels of communication and collaboration on surgical teams but not with scale measures of teamwork climate, safety climate, or working conditions

被引:194
作者
Davenport, Daniel L.
Henderson, William G.
Mosca, Cecilia L.
Khuri, Shukrl F.
Mentzer, Robert M., Jr.
机构
[1] Univ Kentucky, Dept Surg, Lexington, KY 40536 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Hlth Outcomes Program, Aurora, CO USA
[3] Natl Surg Qual Improvement Program, W Roxbury, MA USA
[4] Wayne State Univ, Sch Med, Detroit, MI USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.07.039
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Since the Institute of Medicine patient safety reports, a number of survey-based measures of organizational climate safety factors (OCSFs) have been developed. The goal of this study was to measure the impact of OCSFs on risk-adjusted surgical morbidity and mortality. STUDY DESIGN: Surveys were administered to staff on general/vascular surgery services during a year. Surveys included multiitem scales measuring OCSFs. Additionally, perceived levels of communication and collaboration with coworkers were assessed. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was used to assess risk-adjusted morbidity and mortality. Correlations between outcomes and OCSFs were calculated and between outcomes and communication/collaboration with attending and resident doctors, nurses, and other providers. RESULTS: Fifty-two sites participated in the survey: 44 Veterans Affairs and 8 academic medical centers. A total of 6,083 surveys were returned, for a response rate of 52%. The OCSF measures of teamwork climate, safety climate, working conditions, recognition of stress effects, job satisfaction, and burnout demonstrated internal validity but did not correlate with risk-adjusted outcomes. Reported levels of communication/collaboration with attending and resident doctors correlated with risk-adjusted morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: Survey-based teamwork, safety climate, and working conditions scales are not confirmed to measure organizational factors that influence risk-adjusted surgical outcomes. Reported communication/collaboration with attending and resident doctors on surgical services influenced patient morbidity This suggests the importance of doctors' coordination and decision-making roles on surgical teams in providing high-quality and safe care. We propose risk-adjusted morbidity as an effective measure of surgical patient safety.
引用
收藏
页码:778 / 784
页数:7
相关论文
共 42 条
[11]   Validating risk-adjusted surgical outcomes: Site visit assessment of process and structure [J].
Daley, J ;
Forbes, MG ;
Young, GJ ;
Charns, MP ;
Gibbs, JO ;
Hur, K ;
Henderson, W ;
Khuri, SF .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 1997, 185 (04) :341-351
[12]  
Defontes James, 2004, Perm J, V8, P21
[13]  
Felten S, 1997, Nurs Case Manag, V2, P122
[14]   The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in non-veterans administration hospitals - Initial demonstration of feasibility [J].
Fink, AS ;
Campbell, DA ;
Mentzer, RM ;
Henderson, WG ;
Daley, J ;
Bannister, J ;
Hur, K ;
Khuri, SF .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2002, 236 (03) :344-354
[15]   Validating risk-adjusted surgical outcomes: chart review of process of care [J].
Gibbs, J ;
Clark, K ;
Khuri, S ;
Henderson, W ;
Hur, K ;
Daley, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2001, 13 (03) :187-196
[16]  
GMAH L, 2006, AORN J, V83, P227
[17]   A systematic review of the literature on multidisciplinary rounds to design information technology [J].
Gurses, Ayse P. ;
Xiao, Yan .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2006, 13 (03) :267-276
[18]   A review of the literature examining linkages between organizational factors, medical errors, and patient safety [J].
Hoff, T ;
Jameson, L ;
Hannan, E ;
Flink, E .
MEDICAL CARE RESEARCH AND REVIEW, 2004, 61 (01) :3-37
[19]  
*I MED, 1999, T ERR HUM BUIL SAF H
[20]  
Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, 2001, CROSSING QUALITY CHA