The effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation on visual rivalry

被引:41
作者
Pearson, Joel [1 ]
Tadin, Duje [1 ]
Blake, Randolph [2 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Res Ctr, Dept Psychol, Nashville, TN 37203 USA
[2] Univ Sydney, Sch Psychol, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
来源
JOURNAL OF VISION | 2007年 / 7卷 / 07期
关键词
binocular rivalry; transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS); stimulus rivalry; single pulse; bistable; neural excitability;
D O I
10.1167/7.7.2
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
One extensively investigated form of perceptual bistability is binocular rivalry-When dissimilar patterns are presented one to each eye, these patterns compete for perceptual dominance. Here, we report that transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over early visual areas induces alternations during binocular rivalry. The effect of TMS on binocular rivalry was retinotopic, suggesting that rivalry mechanisms are localized in the cortical representation of visual space. The timing of perturbations was highly dependent on individual differences in rivalry alternation frequencies, with more delayed effects found in slower alternators. This finding suggests that both binocular rivalry and TMS dynamics might be contingent on individual differences among observers. We performed an analogous set of experiments by replacing TMS with transient visual stimulation. The results, however, qualitatively and quantitatively differed from those reported with TMS. Finally, we found that TMS over early visual areas does not produce any time-locked effects on another dynamical process-eye-swapping stimulus rivalry. These findings constitute the first causative evidence that binocular rivalry is contingent on neural activity in early visual areas and suggest that binocular rivalry and stimulus rivalry have different neural correlates, supporting multilevel theories of visual rivalry.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Visual competition [J].
Blake, R ;
Logothetis, NK .
NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE, 2002, 3 (01) :13-23
[2]   Visual motion retards alternations between conflicting perceptual interpretations [J].
Blake, R ;
Sobel, KV ;
Gilroy, LA .
NEURON, 2003, 39 (05) :869-878
[3]   A transition between eye and object rivalry determined by stimulus coherence [J].
Bonneh, Y ;
Sagi, D ;
Karni, A .
VISION RESEARCH, 2001, 41 (08) :981-989
[4]   The psychophysics toolbox [J].
Brainard, DH .
SPATIAL VISION, 1997, 10 (04) :433-436
[5]   Distributions of alternation rates in various forms of bistable perception [J].
Brascamp, JW ;
van Ee, R ;
Pestman, WR ;
van den Berg, AV .
JOURNAL OF VISION, 2005, 5 (04) :287-298
[6]  
CARAER OL, 2005, CURR BIOL, V15, pR412
[7]   Modulating the rate and rhythmicity of perceptual rivalry alternations with the mixed 5-HT2A and 5-HT1A agonist psilocybin [J].
Carter, OL ;
Pettigrew, JD ;
Hasler, F ;
Wallis, GM ;
Liu, GB ;
Hell, D ;
Vollenweider, FX .
NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2005, 30 (06) :1154-1162
[8]   A common oscillator for perceptual rivalries? [J].
Carter, OL ;
Pettigrew, JD .
PERCEPTION, 2003, 32 (03) :295-305
[9]   Endogenous attention prolongs dominance durations in binocular rivalry [J].
Chong, SC ;
Tadin, D ;
Blake, R .
JOURNAL OF VISION, 2005, 5 (11) :1004-1012
[10]   The Ferrier Lecture 2004 - What can transcranial magnetic stimulation tell us about how the brain works? [J].
Cowey, A .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2005, 360 (1458) :1185-1205