Hierarchical Bayesian parameter estimation for cumulative prospect theory

被引:149
作者
Nilsson, Hakan [1 ,2 ]
Rieskamp, Jorg [2 ]
Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan [3 ]
机构
[1] Uppsala Univ, Dept Psychol, SE-75142 Uppsala, Sweden
[2] Univ Basel, Basel, Switzerland
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
Decision making; Loss aversion; Maximum likelihood; Shrinkage; WinBUGS; MODELING INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; DECISION FIELD-THEORY; LOSS AVERSION; UTILITY-THEORY; POWER-LAW; CHOICE; TUTORIAL; CURVES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmp.2010.08.006
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Cumulative prospect theory (CPT Tversky & Kahneman, 1992) has provided one of the most influential accounts of how people make decisions under risk. CPT is a formal model with parameters that quantify psychological processes such as loss aversion, subjective values of gains and losses, and subjective probabilities. In practical applications of CPT, the model's parameters are usually estimated using a single-participant maximum likelihood approach. The present study shows the advantages of an alternative, hierarchical Bayesian parameter estimation procedure. Performance of the procedure is illustrated with a parameter recovery study and application to a real data set. The work reveals that without particular constraints on the parameter space, CPT can produce loss aversion without the parameter that has traditionally been associated with loss aversion. In general, the results illustrate that inferences about people's decision processes can crucially depend on the method used to estimate model parameters. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:84 / 93
页数:10
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
AHN WY, J NEUROSCIE IN PRESS
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1947, Theory of Games and Economic Behavior
[4]   DISAPPOINTMENT IN DECISION-MAKING UNDER UNCERTAINTY [J].
BELL, DE .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1985, 33 (01) :1-27
[5]   REGRET IN DECISION-MAKING UNDER UNCERTAINTY [J].
BELL, DE .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1982, 30 (05) :961-981
[6]   MYOPIC LOSS AVERSION AND THE EQUITY PREMIUM PUZZLE [J].
BENARTZI, S ;
THALER, RH .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1995, 110 (01) :73-92
[7]   Tests of theories of decision making: Violations of branch independence and distribution independence [J].
Birnbaum, MH ;
Chavez, A .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1997, 71 (02) :161-194
[8]   New paradoxes of risky decision making [J].
Birnbaum, Michael H. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2008, 115 (02) :463-501
[9]   The priority heuristic:: Making choices without trade-offs [J].
Brandstätter, E ;
Gigerenzer, G ;
Hertwig, R .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2006, 113 (02) :409-432
[10]   Averaging learning curves across and within participants [J].
Brown, S ;
Heathcote, A .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS INSTRUMENTS & COMPUTERS, 2003, 35 (01) :11-21