Resource stress alters hydrological disturbance effects in a stream periphyton community

被引:41
作者
Biggs, BJF
Tuchman, NC
Lowe, RL
Stevenson, RJ
机构
[1] Natl Inst Water & Atmospher Res, Christchurch, New Zealand
[2] Univ Michigan, Biol Stn, Pellston, MI 49769 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2307/3546795
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Scouring reduces stream periphyton biomass during hoods, and levels of light and nutrient resource supply can influence growth and community physiology between Roods. We hypothesised that for a given taxonomic structure, resource stressed communities would have lower resistance and resilience to scour disturbance than resource replete communities. We investigated this in experimental streams with four combinations of light and nutrients. Communities in all treatments were dominated by similar diatoms. Resource supply significantly influenced the resistance to scouring of some components of the communities. In particular, high nutrient stress resulted in low resistance of chlorophyll a biomass (up to 94% loss), whereas moderate light stress and low nutrient stress resulted in the most resistant communities (43% loss). Resilience of chlorophyll a was negatively correlated, and resilience of taxonomic composition was positively correlated, with resource stress. In the treatments with high nutrient supply, chlorophyll a returned to pre-disturbance levels within 6 d, but regeneration of the taxonomic structure took >9 d. For the treatments with low nutrient supply, chlorophyll a took >18 d to recover, but taxonomic composition took only a few days to recover reflecting the dominance of immigration processes (and lack of in situ growth). In all treatments the scour disturbance caused a reduction in growth rates of the regenerating communities relative to the undisturbed control communities. Overall. the disturbance had a longer-term influence on community persistence under moderate to high resource stress than under low resource stress.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 108
页数:14
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [31] THE ROLE OF DISTURBANCE IN STREAM ECOLOGY
    RESH, VH
    BROWN, AV
    COVICH, AP
    GURTZ, ME
    LI, HW
    MINSHALL, GW
    REICE, SR
    SHELDON, AL
    WALLACE, JB
    WISSMAR, RC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NORTH AMERICAN BENTHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1988, 7 (04): : 433 - 455
  • [32] Runkle J. R., 1985, The ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamics, P17
  • [33] EXTRACTION OF CHLOROPHYLL-A FROM FRESH-WATER PHYTOPLANKTON FOR SPECTROPHOTOMETRIC ANALYSIS
    SARTORY, DP
    GROBBELAAR, JU
    [J]. HYDROBIOLOGIA, 1984, 114 (03) : 177 - 187
  • [34] RESILIENCE OF LOTIC ECOSYSTEMS TO A LIGHT-ELIMINATION DISTURBANCE
    STEINMAN, AD
    MULHOLLAND, PJ
    PALUMBO, AV
    FLUM, TF
    DEANGELIS, DL
    [J]. ECOLOGY, 1991, 72 (04) : 1299 - 1313
  • [35] RESISTANCE OF LOTIC ECOSYSTEMS TO A LIGHT ELIMINATION DISTURBANCE - A LABORATORY STREAM STUDY
    STEINMAN, AD
    MULHOLLAND, PJ
    PALUMBO, AV
    FLUM, TF
    ELWOOD, JW
    DEANGELIS, DL
    [J]. OIKOS, 1990, 58 (01) : 80 - 90
  • [36] THE PATCH DYNAMICS CONCEPT OF STREAM COMMUNITY ECOLOGY
    TOWNSEND, CR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NORTH AMERICAN BENTHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1989, 8 (01): : 36 - 50
  • [37] Tuchman Nancy C., 1996, P299, DOI 10.1016/B978-012668450-6/50039-4
  • [38] UEHLINGER U, 1991, ARCH HYDROBIOL, V123, P219
  • [39] VERTICAL HYDROLOGIC EXCHANGE AND ECOLOGICAL STABILITY OF A DESERT STREAM ECOSYSTEM
    VALETT, HM
    FISHER, SG
    GRIMM, NB
    CAMILL, P
    [J]. ECOLOGY, 1994, 75 (02) : 548 - 560
  • [40] WEBSTER JR, STREAM ECOLOGY APPL, V355, P83