The development of a short form of the sensitivity to punishment and sensitivity to reward questionnaire

被引:43
作者
Cooper, Andrew [1 ]
Gomez, Rapson [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ London Goldsmiths Coll, Dept Psychol, London SE14 6NW, England
[2] Univ Tasmania, Sch Psychol, Hobart, Tas 7001, Australia
关键词
sensitivity to punishment; sensitivity to reward; factor analysis; item response theory; reinforcement sensitivity theory;
D O I
10.1027/1614-0001.29.2.90
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The Sensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire (SPSRQ) has been proposed as a measure of the behavioral approach system (BAS) and behavioral inhibition system (BIS). Previous research with the SPSRQ has highlighted potential problems with the factor structure of the measure and individual item properties. The aim of the current studies was to use factor analytic and item response theory (IRT) methods to examine the psychometric properties of the SPSRQ. A further aim was to develop a short version of the SPSRQ. In Study 1, 393 adult participants completed the SPSRQ. The results from this study highlighted problems with the factor structure and item properties that had been noted in previous research. On this basis, a short form of the measure was proposed. In Study 2, the short form of the SPSRQ was tested with an independent sample (N = 327). These analyses suggested the short form of the SPSRQ had an improved factor structure, good item properties, and acceptable reliability.
引用
收藏
页码:90 / 104
页数:15
相关论文
共 35 条
[11]   The measurement of individual differences in Behavioural Inhibition and Behavioural Activation Systems: a comparison of personality scales [J].
Caseras, X ;
Avila, C ;
Torrubia, R .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2003, 34 (06) :999-1013
[12]   A psychometric evaluation of behavioral inhibition and approach self-report measures [J].
Cogswell, A ;
Alloy, LB ;
van Dulmen, MHM ;
Fresco, DM .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2006, 40 (08) :1649-1658
[13]  
Cooper A.J., 2007, J. Individ. Differ, V728, P179, DOI [DOI 10.1027/1614-0001.28.4.179, 10.1027/1614-0001.28.4.179]
[14]   The Behavioural Inhibition System and Behavioural Approach System (BIS/BAS) Scales: Measurement and structural invariance across adults and adolescents [J].
Cooper, Andrew ;
Gomez, Rapson ;
Aucote, Helen .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2007, 43 (02) :295-305
[15]   Reinforcement sensitivity theory and personality [J].
Corr, PJ .
NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2004, 28 (03) :317-332
[16]   Testing problems in J. A. Gray's personality theory: a commentary on Matthews and Gilliland (1999) [J].
Corr, PJ .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2001, 30 (02) :333-352
[17]  
Embretson S. E., 2000, ITEM RESPONSE THEORY, Vxi, P371
[18]  
Eysenck H. J., 1984, Eysenck personality questionnaire-revised, DOI [10.1037/t05461-000, DOI 10.1037/T05461-000]
[19]   An item response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment [J].
Fraley, RC ;
Waller, NG ;
Brennan, KA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 78 (02) :350-365
[20]   An item response theory analysis of the Carver and White (1994) BIS/BAS Scales [J].
Gomez, R ;
Cooper, A ;
Gomez, A .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2005, 39 (06) :1093-1103