Instructions for motor learning: Differential effects of internal versus external focus of attention

被引:440
作者
Wulf, G
Hoss, M
Prinz, W
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Psychol Res, D-80802 Munich, Germany
[2] Univ Munich, D-80539 Munich, Germany
关键词
focus of attention; instructions; motor learning; ski-simulator;
D O I
10.1080/00222899809601334
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The effects of different types of instructions on complex motor skill learning were examined. The instructions were related either to the participant's own body movements (internal focus) or to the effects of those movements on the apparatus (external focus). The hypothesis tested was that external-focus instructions would be more beneficial for learning than internal-focus instructions. In Experiment I, the participants (N = 33) performed slalom-type movements on a ski-simulator. The instructions referred to the way in which force should be exerted on the platform that the participant was standing on. The instructions given 1 group of participants referred to the performers' feet (internal focus), whereas the instructions given another group referred to the wheels of the platform, which were located directly under the feet (external focus). The control group was given no focus instructions. All participants practiced the task on 2 consecutive days and performed a retention test on Day 3. Compared with the effects of internal-focus instructions and no instructions, the external-focus instructions enhanced learning. Internal-focus instruction was not more effective than no instructions. In Experiment 2, an attempt was made to replicate the differential effects of external-versus internal-focus instructions with a different task (balancing on a stabilometer). Consistent with Experiment 1, instructing learners (N = 16) to focus on 2 markers on the platform of the stabilometer (external focus) led to more effective learning than instructing them to focus on their feet (internal focus), as measured by a retention test after 2 days of practice. Practical and theoretical implications of those results are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 179
页数:11
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
ANDERSON JA, 1995, HUMAN LEARNING MEMOR
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1991, DYNAMICS SKILL ACQUI
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1988, Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis
[5]   PARADOXICAL EFFECTS OF SUPPORTIVE AUDIENCES ON PERFORMANCE UNDER PRESSURE - THE HOME FIELD DISADVANTAGE IN SPORTS CHAMPIONSHIPS [J].
BAUMEISTER, RF ;
STEINHILBER, A .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1984, 47 (01) :85-93
[6]   INTERACTIVE TASKS AND THE IMPLICIT EXPLICIT DISTINCTION [J].
BERRY, DC ;
BROADBENT, DE .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1988, 79 :251-272
[7]  
BLISS CB, 1892, STUDIES YALE PSYCHOL, V1, P1
[8]  
BODER DP, 1935, COMP PSYCHOL MONOGRA, V11
[9]   Optimal movement pattern characteristics are not required as a reference for knowledge of performance [J].
Brison, TA ;
Alain, C .
RESEARCH QUARTERLY FOR EXERCISE AND SPORT, 1996, 67 (04) :458-464
[10]  
Christina R W, 1973, Res Q, V44, P483