In vivo measurement of the brain and skull resistivities using an EIT-based method and the combined analysis of SEF/SEP data

被引:71
作者
Gonçalves, S
de Munck, JC
Verbunt, JPA
Heethaar, RM
da Silva, FHL
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, MEG Ctr, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Lisbon, Fac Sci, Inst Biophys & Biomed Engn, P-1700 Lisbon, Portugal
[3] Univ Hosp Vrije Univ, Inst Cardiovasc Res ICaR VU, Lab Clin Phys & Informat, NL-1007 MB Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Inst Neurobiol, NL-1098 SM Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
EEG inverse problem; electric impedance tomography; electrical resistivities; somatosensory evoked responses; three-layer sphere head model;
D O I
10.1109/TBME.2003.816072
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Results of "in vivo", measurements of the skull and brain resistivities are presented for six subjects. Results are obtained using two different methods, based on spherical head models. The first method uses the principles of electrical impedance tomography (EIT) to estimate the equivalent electrical resistivities of brain (rho(brain)), skull (rho(skull)) and skin (rho(skin)) according to [1]. The second one estimates the same parameters through a combined analysis of the evoked somatosensory cortical response, recorded simultaneously using magnetoencephalography (MEG) and electroencephalography (EEG). The EIT results, obtained with the same relative skull thickness (0.05) for all subjects, show a wide variation of the ratio rho(skull)/rho(brain) among subjects (average = 72, SD = 48%). However, the rho(skull)/rho(brain) ratios of the individual subjects are well reproduced by combined analysis of somatosensory evoked fields (SEF) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP). These preliminary results suggest that the rho(skull)/rho(brain) variations over subjects cannot be disregarded in the EEG inverse problem (IP) when a spherical model is used. The agreement between EIT and SEF/SEP points to the fact that whatever the source of variability, the proposed EIT-based method <Au: Addition of "method" O.K? appears to have the potential to reduce systematic errors in EEG IP associated to the misspecification of rho(skull)/rho(brain), rho(brain), rho(skull) and rho(skin).
引用
收藏
页码:1124 / 1128
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] Conductivities of three-layer live human skull
    Akhtari, M
    Bryant, HC
    Marnelak, AN
    Flynn, ER
    Heller, L
    Shih, JJ
    Mandelkern, M
    Matlachov, A
    Ranken, DM
    Best, ED
    DiMauro, MA
    Lee, RR
    Sutherling, WW
    [J]. BRAIN TOPOGRAPHY, 2002, 14 (03) : 151 - 167
  • [2] APPLIED POTENTIAL TOMOGRAPHY
    BARBER, DC
    BROWN, BH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSICS E-SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, 1984, 17 (09): : 723 - 733
  • [3] Estimating stationary dipoles from MEG/EEG data contaminated with spatially and temporally correlated background noise
    de Munck, JC
    Huizenga, HM
    Waldorp, LJ
    Heethaar, RM
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2002, 50 (07) : 1565 - 1572
  • [4] The use of an MEG device as 3D digitizer and motion monitoring system
    de Munck, JC
    Verbunt, JPA
    Van't Ent, D
    Van Dijk, BW
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2001, 46 (08) : 2041 - 2052
  • [5] A FAST METHOD TO COMPUTE THE POTENTIAL IN THE MULTISPHERE MODEL
    DEMUNCK, JC
    PETERS, MJ
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 1993, 40 (11) : 1166 - 1174
  • [6] The application of electrical impedance tomography to reduce systematic errors in the EEG inverse problem -: a simulation study
    Gonçalves, S
    de Munck, JC
    Heethaar, RM
    da Silva, FHL
    van Dijk, BW
    [J]. PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2000, 21 (03) : 379 - 393
  • [7] In vivo measurement of the brain and skull resistivities using an EIT-based method and realistic models for the head
    Gonçalves, SI
    de Munck, JC
    Verbunt, JPA
    Bijma, F
    Heethaar, RM
    da Silva, FL
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2003, 50 (06) : 754 - 767
  • [8] Simultaneous MEG and EEG source analysis
    Huizenga, HM
    van Zuijen, TL
    Heslenfeld, DJ
    Molenaar, PCM
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2001, 46 (07) : 1737 - 1751
  • [9] Trends in EEG source localization
    Koles, ZJ
    [J]. ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1998, 106 (02): : 127 - 137
  • [10] EEG and MEG: Forward solutions for inverse methods
    Mosher, JC
    Leahy, RM
    Lewis, PS
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 1999, 46 (03) : 245 - 259