Three microarray platforms: an analysis of their concordance in profiling gene expression

被引:70
作者
Petersen, D
Chandramouli, GVR
Geoghegan, J
Hilburn, J
Paarlberg, J
Kim, CH
Munroe, D
Gangi, L
Han, J
Puri, R
Staudt, L
Weinstein, J
Barrett, JC
Green, J
Kawasaki, ES [1 ]
机构
[1] NCI, Ctr Adv Technol, Canc Res Ctr, Gaithersburg, MD 20877 USA
[2] SAIC Frederick, Lab Mol Technol, Frederick, MD 21701 USA
[3] US FDA, Ctr Biol Evaluat & Res, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[4] NCI, Canc Res Ctr, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1186/1471-2164-6-63
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Background: Microarrays for the analysis of gene expression are of three different types: short oligonucleotide (25-30 base), long oligonucleotide (50-80 base), and cDNA ( highly variable in length). The short oligonucleotide and cDNA arrays have been the mainstay of expression analysis to date, but long oligonucleotide platforms are gaining in popularity and will probably replace cDNA arrays. As part of a validation study for the long oligonucleotide arrays, we compared and contrasted expression profiles from the three formats, testing RNA from six different cell lines against a universal reference standard. Results: The three platforms had 6430 genes in common. In general, correlation of gene expression levels across the platforms was good when defined by concordance in the direction of expression difference (upregulation or downregulation), scatter plot analysis, principal component analysis, cell line correlation or quantitative RT-PCR. The overall correlations (r values) between platforms were in the range 0.7 to 0.8, as determined by analysis of scatter plots. When concordance was measured for expression ratios significant at p-values of < 0.05 and at expression threshold levels of 1.5 and 2-fold, the agreement among the platforms was very high, ranging from 93% to 100%. Conclusion: Our results indicate that the long oligonucleotide platform is highly suitable for expression analysis and compares favorably with the cDNA and short oligonucleotide varieties. All three platforms can give similar and reproducible results if the criterion is the direction of change in gene expression and minimal emphasis is placed on the magnitude of change.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1979, Multivariate analysis
[2]   Spotted long oligonucleotide arrays for human gene expression analysis [J].
Barczak, A ;
Rodriguez, MW ;
Hanspers, K ;
Koth, LL ;
Tai, YC ;
Bolstad, BM ;
Speed, TP ;
Erle, DJ .
GENOME RESEARCH, 2003, 13 (07) :1775-1785
[3]   Microarrays: the use of oligonucleotides and cDNA for the analysis of gene expression [J].
Barrett, JC ;
Kawasaki, ES .
DRUG DISCOVERY TODAY, 2003, 8 (03) :134-141
[4]   High-density oligonucleotide arrays [J].
Blanchard, AP ;
Kaiser, RJ ;
Hood, LE .
BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS, 1996, 11 (6-7) :687-690
[5]   Multi-platform, multi-site, microarray-based human tumor classification [J].
Bloom, G ;
Yang, IV ;
Boulware, D ;
Kwong, KY ;
Coppola, D ;
Eschrich, S ;
Quackenbush, J ;
Yeatman, TJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 2004, 164 (01) :9-16
[6]   MatchMiner: a tool for batch navigation among gene and gene product identifiers [J].
Bussey, KJ ;
Kane, D ;
Sunshine, M ;
Narasimhan, S ;
Nishizuka, S ;
Reinhold, WC ;
Zeeberg, B ;
Ajay ;
Weinstein, JN .
GENOME BIOLOGY, 2003, 4 (04)
[7]   In situ-synthesized novel microarray optimized for mouse stem cell and early developmental expression profiling [J].
Carter, MG ;
Hamatani, T ;
Sharov, AA ;
Carmack, CE ;
Qian, Y ;
Aiba, K ;
Ko, NT ;
Dudekula, DB ;
Brzoska, PM ;
Hwang, SS ;
Ko, MSH .
GENOME RESEARCH, 2003, 13 (05) :1011-1021
[8]   Microarray analysis in fibroids: which gene list is the correct list? [J].
Catherino, WH ;
Segars, JH .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2003, 80 (02) :293-294
[9]  
Chen SL, 1996, ONCOGENE, V12, P741
[10]   Cross-platform comparison and visualisation of gene expression data using co-inertia analysis -: art. no. 59 [J].
Culhane, AC ;
Perrière, G ;
Higgins, DG .
BMC BIOINFORMATICS, 2003, 4 (1)