Psychological and situational influences on commuter-transport-mode choice

被引:136
作者
Collins, CM [1 ]
Chambers, SM
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, NL-3508 TC Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Deakin Univ, Sch Psychol, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
proenvironmental behavior; commuter choice; environmental values; environmental beliefs;
D O I
10.1177/0013916504265440
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The relative importance and relationship between psychological and situational factors in predicting commuter-transport-mode choice was tested by four hypotheses, First, the influence of individuals' values on commuter behavior is mediated by their corresponding beliefs about the environmental threat of cars (mediation hypothesis), Second, the influence of these beliefs on behavior is moderated by individual consideration of future consequences, and control belief's (moderation hypothesis). Third, cost. time. and access factors contribute to (situational hypothesis). Fourth. situational and psychological factors jointly influence proenvironmental behavior (interaction hypothesis). A sample of 205 Australian university Students completed a survey to measure these relationships. Regression analyses indicated Support for the interaction hypotheses. It was concluded that to achieve a transport-mode shift It) public transport. public policy strategies should focus (In individuals' transport-related environmental beliefs (personal control and environmental effect of cars) Bind situations (access to public transport at reduced cost).
引用
收藏
页码:640 / 661
页数:22
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Environmental locus of control, sympathy, and proenvironmental behavior - A test of Geller's actively caring hypothesis [J].
Allen, JB ;
Ferrand, JL .
ENVIRONMENT AND BEHAVIOR, 1999, 31 (03) :338-353
[2]  
*AM PSYCH ASS, 2002, APA ETH PRINC PSYCH
[3]  
Anderson JB, 1989, ED RES Q, V13, P47
[4]   Changing travel-mode choice as rational choice: Results from a longitudinal intervention study [J].
Bamberg, S ;
Schmidt, P .
RATIONALITY AND SOCIETY, 1998, 10 (02) :223-252
[5]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[6]   PERSONAL AND CONTEXTUAL INFLUENCES ON HOUSEHOLD ENERGY ADAPTATIONS [J].
BLACK, JS ;
STERN, PC ;
ELWORTH, JT .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1985, 70 (01) :3-21
[7]   Social value orientations and decisions to take proenvironmental action [J].
Cameron, LD ;
Brown, PM ;
Chapman, JG .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 28 (08) :675-697
[8]   Reexamining the theory of planned behavior in understanding wastepaper recycling [J].
Cheung, SF ;
Chan, DKS ;
Wong, ZSY .
ENVIRONMENT AND BEHAVIOR, 1999, 31 (05) :587-612
[9]   Environmental values, beliefs, and actions - A situational approach [J].
Corraliza, JA ;
Berenguer, J .
ENVIRONMENT AND BEHAVIOR, 2000, 32 (06) :832-848
[10]   Expanding and evaluating motives for environmentally responsible behavior [J].
De Young, R .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ISSUES, 2000, 56 (03) :509-526