Structuring Supplier Involvement in New Product Development: A China-US Study

被引:33
作者
Yan, Tingting [1 ]
Nair, Anand [2 ]
机构
[1] Wayne State Univ, Sch Business Adm, Dept Mkt & Supply Chain Management, 5201 Cass Ave, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
[2] Michigan State Univ, Dept Supply Chain Management, Eli Broad Coll Business, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
关键词
Contingency Theory; Intergroup Structure; New Product Development; Organizational Dependence; Performance; Supplier Involvement; INTERORGANIZATIONAL RELATIONSHIPS; BUYER-SUPPLIER; RELATIONAL EMBEDDEDNESS; NATIONAL CULTURE; CHAIN MANAGEMENT; MODERATING ROLE; UNITED-STATES; PERFORMANCE; INNOVATION; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1111/deci.12195
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Buying and supplying organizations rely on each other for developing better products in an efficient manner, which explains the popularity of involving suppliers in new product development (NPD). However, such involvement is not always successful, partially due to the challenges of structuring a buyer-supplier team to manage joint dependence and dependence asymmetry. This study adopts an organizational dependence view to examine how three types of intergroup structuresadministrative (formalization and centralization), task (task interdependence), and physical (colocation)influence project performance and buyer learning in NPD projects. Furthermore, adopting a contingency theory perspective, we study whether the national context moderates the effects of intergroup structures on project outcomes. We adopt a two-group structural equation modeling approach to test hypotheses with survey responses from a sample of NPD projects in the United States (US) and China. Results show different ways in which intergroup structures influence project performance and buyer learning in the two culturally, economically, and institutionally distinct countries. We discuss the implications of these new findings and present directions for future research.
引用
收藏
页码:589 / 627
页数:39
相关论文
共 137 条
[1]   Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study [J].
Ahuja, G .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2000, 45 (03) :425-455
[2]   ORGANIZATIONAL INTERDEPENDENCE AND INTRA-ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE [J].
AIKEN, M ;
HAGE, J .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1968, 33 (06) :912-930
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, NATL SYSTEMS INNOVAT
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2004, CULTURE LEADERSHIP O
[5]   SUPPLIER INNOVATIVENESS AND THE ROLE OF INTERORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING IN ENHANCING MANUFACTURER CAPABILITIES [J].
Azadegan, Arash ;
Dooley, Kevin J. ;
Carter, Phillip L. ;
Carter, Joseph R. .
JOURNAL OF SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT, 2008, 44 (04) :14-35
[6]   Effects of task interdependence on the relationship between helping behavior and group performance [J].
Bachrach, Daniel G. ;
Powell, Benjamin C. ;
Collins, Brian J. ;
Richey, R. Glenn .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 91 (06) :1396-1405
[8]   CONFIGURATIONS OF INTERORGANIZATIONAL RELATIONSHIPS - A COMPARISON BETWEEN US AND JAPANESE AUTOMAKERS [J].
BENSAOU, M ;
VENKATRAMAN, N .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1995, 41 (09) :1471-1492
[9]   Fishing upstream: Firm innovation strategy and university research alliances [J].
Bercovitz, Janet E. L. ;
Feldman, Maryann P. .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2007, 36 (07) :930-948
[10]   Where (who) are collectives in collectivism? Toward conceptual clarification of individualism and collectivism [J].
Brewer, Marilynn B. ;
Chen, Ya-Ru .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2007, 114 (01) :133-151