Sequential use of ferumoxide particles and gadolinium chelate for the evaluation of focal liver lesions on MRI

This study describes the sequential use of ferumoxide (superparamagnetic iron oxide) particles and nonspecific extracellular gadolinium chelate (Gd) for evaluation of focal liver lesions on MRI to evaluate order of contrast administration and imaging effect of the first contrast agent on sequences acquired after the second contrast agent. Thirteen patients underwent MR examinations that included ferumoxide and Gd, The order and timing of administration were as follows: separate sessions (three patients: Gd study 4-19 days before ferumoxide study), same session, Gd first (seven patients; Gd study 1-2 hours before ferumoxide study), and same session, ferumoxide first (three patients; ferumoxide administered less than 1 hour before Gd study). Postcontrast sequences were reviewed in a randomized, blinded fashion by two separate investigators. Determination was made regarding whether (a) the presence of the first agent administered could be detected on sequences obtained after the second agent and (b) the presence of the first agent interfered with the image quality of those sequences. No evidence for the presence of Gd was appreciated by either observer on postferumoxide sequences acquired in separate session studies. In same session, Gd first studies, the presence of Gd was observed in six of seven patients on T1-weighted spoiled gradient-echo (SGE) images obtained after ferumoxide administration. The presence of Gd was not apparent in seven of seven patients on TP-weighted fat-suppressed images obtained after ferumoxide, In same session, ferumoxide first studies, the presence of ferumoxide was appreciated on post-Gd sequences in two of three patients. The presence of ferumoxide did not appreciably diminish image quality on those sequences. Exact agreement was achieved by the independent investigators, Our results suggest that Gd and ferumoxide can be administered sequentially within one study session without substantial loss of diagnostic information obtained on sequences performed after administration of the second contrast agent. Administrating Gd first resulted in less of an effect of the visualization of the first agent on sequences acquired after the second agent.