Surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer

被引:157
作者
Boyle, KM
Sagar, PM
Chalmers, AG
Sebag-Montefiore, D
Cairns, A
Eardley, I
机构
[1] Gen Infirm, Dept Surg, Leeds LS1 3EX, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Gen Infirm, Dept Radiol, Leeds LS1 3EX, W Yorkshire, England
[3] Gen Infirm, Dept Oncol, Leeds LS1 3EX, W Yorkshire, England
[4] Univ Leeds, Acad Unit Pathol, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
recurrent rectal cancer; multimodal treatment; sacrectomy; circumferential resection margin;
D O I
10.1007/s10350-004-0909-0
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
PURPOSE: Resection of locally recurrent rectal cancer after curative resection represents a difficult clinical problem and a surgical challenge. The aim of this study was to assess the outcome of a series of patients who underwent resection of locally recurrent rectal cancer with curative intent. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of 64 patients, who underwent surgical exploration with a view to cure for locally recurrent rectal cancer under the care of one surgeon between April 1997 and April 2004. Details were obtained on the primary tumor and the operation, the indication for investigation of recurrence, preoperative imaging, operative findings, morbidity and mortality, and histopathology. RESULTS: The median time interval between resection of primary turner and surgery for locally recurrent disease was 31 (interquartile range, 21 to 48) months. Twenty-three patients had central disease, 10 patients had sacral involvement. 21 patients had pelvic sidewall involvement, and 10 patients had both sacral and sidewall involvement. Fifty-seven patients underwent resection of the tumor. Thirty-nine of the 57 patients underwent wide resection (abdominoperineal excision of rectum, anterior resection, or Hartmann's procedure) whereas 18 patients (31.6 percent) required radical resection (pelvic exenteration or sacrectomy). Curative, negative resection margins were obtained in 21 of 57 patients who had tumor excision (36.8 percent). Perioperative mortality was 1.6 percent. Significant postoperative morbidity occurred in 40 percent of patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown that a significant proportion of patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer can undergo resection with negative margins.
引用
收藏
页码:929 / 937
页数:9
相关论文
共 41 条
[11]  
2-F
[12]  
HAASKOCK DFM, 1996, BRIT J SURG, V83, P781
[13]   Curative potential of multimodality therapy for locally recurrent rectal cancer [J].
Hahnloser, D ;
Nelson, H ;
Gunderson, LL ;
Hassan, I ;
Haddock, MG ;
O'Connell, MJ ;
Cha, S ;
Sargent, DJ ;
Horgan, A .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2003, 237 (04) :502-508
[14]   Intraoperative irradiation after surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer [J].
Hashiguchi, Y ;
Sekine, T ;
Sakamoto, H ;
Tanaka, Y ;
Kazumoto, T ;
Kato, S ;
Sakura, M ;
Fuse, Y ;
Suda, Y .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1999, 42 (07) :886-893
[15]   Treatment of local recurrence of rectal cancer [J].
Huguier, M ;
Houry, S .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1998, 175 (04) :288-292
[16]   Efficacy of chemoradiotherapy on pain relief in patients with intrapelvic recurrence of rectal cancer [J].
Ito, Y ;
Ohtsu, A ;
Ishikura, S ;
Boku, N ;
Nihei, K ;
Ogino, T ;
Ikeda, H .
JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 33 (04) :180-185
[17]   Resection of local recurrence of rectal cancer: Results [J].
Law, WL ;
Chu, KW .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2000, 24 (04) :486-490
[18]   Locally recurrent rectal cancer - Predictors and success of salvage surgery [J].
Lopez-Kostner, F ;
Fazio, VW ;
Vignali, A ;
Rybicki, LA ;
Lavery, IC .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2001, 44 (02) :173-178
[19]   Comparison of intraoperative radiation therapy-containing multimodality treatment with historical treatment modalities for locally recurrent rectal cancer [J].
Mannaerts, GHH ;
Rutten, HJT ;
Martijn, H ;
Hanssens, PEJ ;
Wiggers, T .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2001, 44 (12) :1749-1758
[20]   LOCAL RECURRENCE AFTER POTENTIALLY CURATIVE RESECTION FOR RECTAL-CANCER IN A SERIES OF 1008 PATIENTS [J].
MCDERMOTT, FT ;
HUGHES, ESR ;
PIHL, E ;
JOHNSON, WR ;
PRICE, AB .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1985, 72 (01) :34-37