A Common Nomenclature for Stated Preference Elicitation Approaches

被引:172
作者
Carson, Richard T. [1 ,2 ]
Louviere, Jordan J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Econ, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[2] Univ Technol Sydney, Ctr Study Choice, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia
关键词
Contingent valuation; Discrete choice modeling; Survey questions; CONTINGENT VALUATION; CHOICE EXPERIMENTS; CONJOINT-MEASUREMENT; DISCRETE-CHOICE; STANDARD GAMBLE; RESPONDENTS; UTILITY; WILLINGNESS; DESIGN; WATER;
D O I
10.1007/s10640-010-9450-x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
It is often difficult to determine what actually was done in work involving data collected with stated preference surveys because the terms used to describe various procedures have ambiguous and sometimes conflicting meanings. Further, terms used to describe data collection procedures often are confounded with terms used to describe statistical techniques. We call for the use of a common nomenclature to describe what was done in a data collection effort for stated preference studies, and take a first step at setting out such nomenclature. We only seek to improve clarity in the communication of research results and take no position here on appropriateness of particular procedures.
引用
收藏
页码:539 / 559
页数:21
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]   Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values: Choice experiments and contingent valuation [J].
Adamowicz, W ;
Boxall, P ;
Williams, M ;
Louviere, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1998, 80 (01) :64-75
[2]   Modeling response incentive effects in dichotomous choice contingent valuation data [J].
Alberini, A ;
Kanninen, B ;
Carson, RT .
LAND ECONOMICS, 1997, 73 (03) :309-324
[3]   Analysis of contingent valuation data with multiple bids and response options allowing respondents to express uncertainty [J].
Alberini, A ;
Boyle, K ;
Welsh, M .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2003, 45 (01) :40-62
[4]   FUNCTIONAL MEASUREMENT AND PSYCHOPHYSICAL JUDGMENT [J].
ANDERSON, NH .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1970, 77 (03) :153-&
[5]  
[Anonymous], INT YB ENV RESOURCE
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2009, STAND DEF FIN DISP C
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1971, CONSUMER DEMAND NEW
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1992, Microeconomic analysis
[9]  
Arrow K., 1993, Federal Register, V58, P4601
[10]   Can ranking techniques elicit robust values? [J].
Bateman, Ian ;
Day, Brett ;
Loomes, Graham ;
Sugden, Robert .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 2007, 34 (01) :49-66