A Common Nomenclature for Stated Preference Elicitation Approaches

被引:172
作者
Carson, Richard T. [1 ,2 ]
Louviere, Jordan J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Econ, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[2] Univ Technol Sydney, Ctr Study Choice, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia
关键词
Contingent valuation; Discrete choice modeling; Survey questions; CONTINGENT VALUATION; CHOICE EXPERIMENTS; CONJOINT-MEASUREMENT; DISCRETE-CHOICE; STANDARD GAMBLE; RESPONDENTS; UTILITY; WILLINGNESS; DESIGN; WATER;
D O I
10.1007/s10640-010-9450-x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
It is often difficult to determine what actually was done in work involving data collected with stated preference surveys because the terms used to describe various procedures have ambiguous and sometimes conflicting meanings. Further, terms used to describe data collection procedures often are confounded with terms used to describe statistical techniques. We call for the use of a common nomenclature to describe what was done in a data collection effort for stated preference studies, and take a first step at setting out such nomenclature. We only seek to improve clarity in the communication of research results and take no position here on appropriateness of particular procedures.
引用
收藏
页码:539 / 559
页数:21
相关论文
共 79 条
[11]   PROCEDURAL INVARIANCE TESTING OF THE ONE-AND-ONE-HALF-BOUND DICHOTOMOUS CHOICE ELICITATION METHOD [J].
Bateman, Ian J. ;
Day, Brett H. ;
Dupont, Diane P. ;
Georgiou, Stavros .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2009, 91 (04) :806-820
[12]   ELICITATION AND TRUNCATION EFFECTS IN CONTINGENT VALUATION STUDIES [J].
BATEMAN, IJ ;
LANGFORD, IH ;
TURNER, RK ;
WILLIS, KG ;
GARROD, GD .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1995, 12 (02) :161-179
[13]   MEASURING UTILITY BY A SINGLE-RESPONSE SEQUENTIAL METHOD [J].
BECKER, GM ;
DEGROOT, MH ;
MARSCHAK, J .
BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 1964, 9 (03) :226-232
[14]  
Bennett J., 2001, The Choice Modelling Approach to Environmental Valuation
[15]   Standard gamble, time trade-off and rating scale: Experimental results on the ranking properties of QALYs [J].
Bleichrodt, H ;
Johannesson, M .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 1997, 16 (02) :155-175
[16]   REFERENDUM CONTINGENT VALUATION ESTIMATES - SENSITIVITY TO THE ASSIGNMENT OF OFFERED VALUES [J].
CAMERON, TA ;
HUPPERT, DD .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1991, 86 (416) :910-918
[17]  
CARSON R.T., 1991, MEASURING DEMAND ENV
[18]  
Carson R.T., 1990, VISIBILITY FINE PART
[19]  
Carson R.T., 2004, Valuing oil spill prevention
[20]   Incentive and informational properties of preference questions [J].
Carson, Richard T. ;
Groves, Theodore .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2007, 37 (01) :181-210