A common set of immediate-early response genes in liver regeneration and hyperplasia

被引:71
作者
Locker, J
Tian, JM
Carver, R
Concas, D
Cossu, C
Ledda-Columbano, GM
Columbano, A
机构
[1] Yeshiva Univ Albert Einstein Coll Med, Dept Pathol, Bronx, NY 10461 USA
[2] Yeshiva Univ Albert Einstein Coll Med, Marion Bessin Liver Res Ctr, Bronx, NY 10461 USA
[3] Univ Cagliari, Dept Toxicol, Unit Oncol & Mol Pathol, Cagliari, Italy
关键词
D O I
10.1053/jhep.2003.50299
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Partial hepatectomy (PH) and some tumor-promoting agents stimulate hepatocyte cell proliferation, but each treatment acts through distinct transcription factors. We compared mouse immediate-early gene expression changes after PH with those induced by 1.4-bis[2-(3,5-dichoropyridyloxy)]benzene (TCPOBOP), a tumor-promoting liver mitogen. PH activates nuclear factor kappaB (NF-kappaB) and Stat3, whereas TCPOBOP is a ligand for the nuclear receptor, constitutive androstane receptor (CAR). RNA from 1 and 3 hours after each treatment was hybridized to a 9,000 complementary DNA (cDNA) microarray. Of about 6,000 messenger RNAs that had detectable expression, 127 showed reproducible up-regulation or down-regulation at a significant level. The TCPOBOP response was more discrete than the PH response; they amounted to 1% and 1.9% of positive hybridizations, respectively. Twenty-three genes were regulated only by TCPOBOP, 57 only by PH, and 59 by both treatments. More detailed analysis defined 16 clusters with common patterns of expression. These patterns and quantification of hybridization levels on the array were confirmed by Northern blots. TCPOBOP selectively activated expression of a number of detoxification enzymes. In conclusion, the genes that were regulated by both treatments suggest down-regulation of apoptosis, altered signal transduction, and early biogenesis of critical cell components.
引用
收藏
页码:314 / 325
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
AKERMAN P, 1992, AM J PHYSIOL, V263, P579
[2]   A new Smurf in the village [J].
Arora, K ;
Warrior, R .
DEVELOPMENTAL CELL, 2001, 1 (04) :441-442
[3]   EXPERIMENTAL ASPECTS OF HEPATIC REGENERATION (CONCLUDED) [J].
BUCHER, NLR .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1967, 277 (14) :738-+
[4]   Liver regeneration .8. Liver regeneration versus direct hyperplasia [J].
Columbano, A ;
Shinozuka, H .
FASEB JOURNAL, 1996, 10 (10) :1118-1128
[5]   CELL-PROLIFERATION AND PROMOTION OF RAT-LIVER CARCINOGENESIS - DIFFERENT EFFECT OF HEPATIC REGENERATION AND MITOGEN INDUCED HYPERPLASIA ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF ENZYME-ALTERED FOCI [J].
COLUMBANO, A ;
LEDDACOLUMBANO, GM ;
ENNAS, MG ;
CURTO, M ;
CHELO, A ;
PANI, P .
CARCINOGENESIS, 1990, 11 (05) :771-776
[6]   Liver failure and defective hepatocyte regeneration in interleukin-6-deficient mice [J].
Cressman, DE ;
Greenbaum, LE ;
DeAngelis, RA ;
Ciliberto, G ;
Furth, EE ;
Poli, V ;
Taub, R .
SCIENCE, 1996, 274 (5291) :1379-1383
[7]   Induction of gadd45β by NF-κB downregulates pro-apoptotic JNK signalling [J].
De Smaele, E ;
Zazzeroni, F ;
Papa, S ;
Nguyen, DU ;
Jin, RG ;
Jones, J ;
Cong, R ;
Franzoso, G .
NATURE, 2001, 414 (6861) :308-313
[8]   Normal liver regeneration in p50/nuclear factor κB1 knockout mice [J].
DeAngelis, RA ;
Kovalovich, K ;
Cressman, DE ;
Taub, R .
HEPATOLOGY, 2001, 33 (04) :915-924
[9]  
DIAMOND RH, 1993, J BIOL CHEM, V268, P15185
[10]  
DIEHL AM, 1994, HEPATOLOGY, V19, P447