Real options and human capital investment

被引:26
作者
Jacobs, Bas [1 ]
机构
[1] Tinbergen Inst, Dept Econ, NL-1018 WB Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
human capital; higher education; risk; irreversible investment; real options; progressive taxation; education subsidies;
D O I
10.1016/j.labeco.2007.06.008
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper extends the standard human capital model with real options. Real options influence investment behavior when risky investments in human capital are irreversible and individuals can affect the timing of the investment. Option values make individuals more reluctant to invest in human capital and, as a result, required returns on the investment increase. Real options may help to explain a larger human capital premium for higher education, smaller responsiveness of higher educational investments to financial incentives, and larger sensitivity of higher educational investments to low-return outcomes and human capital risks. Higher tax rates (or lower subsidies) depress human capital investments, but to a lesser extent than in the standard human capital model if not all direct costs are tax-deductible. A flat income tax remains neutral if education expenditures are fully deductible. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:913 / 925
页数:13
相关论文
共 39 条
[31]  
LEVHARI D, 1974, AM ECON REV, V64, P950
[32]  
MEHRA R, 2003, EQUITY PREMIUM RETRO, V9525
[33]  
*OECD, 2006, DAT LAB FORC STAT
[34]   An empirical analysis of the risk properties of human capital returns [J].
Palacios-Huerta, I .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2003, 93 (03) :948-964
[35]  
Palacios-Huerta I., 2006, RISK MARKET FRICTION
[36]  
PLUG EJS, 2004, ECON J, V115, P880
[37]  
RUBINSTEIN Y, 2001, BORN BE UNEMPLOYED U
[38]   A theory of the welfare state [J].
Sinn, HW .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1995, 97 (04) :495-526
[39]  
STIGLITZ JE, 1981, AM ECON REV, V71, P393