Surgical treatment and outcomes in carcinoma of the extrahepatic bile ducts -: The University of Rochester experience

被引:40
作者
Blom, D
Schwartz, SI
机构
[1] Univ Rochester, Sch Med & Dent, Dept Surg, Rochester, NY 14642 USA
[2] Univ So Calif, Dept Surg, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archsurg.136.2.209
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Hypothesis: To our knowledge, few individual surgeons and only a handful of institutions have gained a meaningful experience with the treatment of adenocarcinoma of the extrahepatic bile ducts or cholangiocarcinoma. The purpose of this study was to critically evaluate the experience of a single center in the treatment of these tumors. Design: Retrospective cohort study with a median follow-up of 48 months. Setting: Department of surgery at a university referral center. Patients: Seventy-seven patients with biopsyconfirmed adenocarcinoma of the extrahepatic bile ducts evaluated and treated between January 1980 and February 1998. Main Outcome Measures: Prognostic variables, resectability rates, morbidity, and survival. Results: Thirty-eight male and 39 female patients were studied (median age, 71 years). Twenty-three patients (30%) underwent curative resections, 32 patients (41%) underwent palliative surgery, and 22 patients (29%) received nonoperative therapies. The 30-day perioperative morbidity rate was 18%, and mortality was 6%. Overall median survival was II months; 4 months for patients receiving nonoperative therapy; 8 months for patients recieving palliative surgery; and 72 months for curative resection. Five-year survival rates were 23%, 0% 10%, and 55%, respectively. Curative resection was the only prognostic variable to have a statistically significant effect on survival. Conclusions: Curative resection could be achieved in approximately one third of patients who had cholangiocarcinoma, and should be the goal of treatment. Survival is significantly improved in those patients who are considered to have resectable tumors and who undergo removal of all gross disease. Palliative surgical treatments also revealed a survival advantage over nonoperative therapies.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 214
页数:6
相关论文
共 55 条
[31]  
MIZUMOTO R, 1986, SURG GYNECOL OBSTET, V162, P153
[32]   RESECTION AND BYPASS FOR MALIGNANT OBSTRUCTION OF THE BILE-DUCT [J].
MYBURGH, JA .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1995, 19 (01) :108-112
[33]  
NAGORNEY DM, 1993, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V128, P871
[34]   HEPATIC SEGMENTECTOMY WITH CAUDATE LOBE RESECTION FOR BILE-DUCT CARCINOMA OF THE HEPATIC HILUS [J].
NIMURA, Y ;
HAYAKAWA, N ;
KAMIYA, J ;
KONDO, S ;
SHIONOYA, S .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1990, 14 (04) :535-544
[35]  
NORDBACK IH, 1994, SURGERY, V115, P597
[36]   SURGICAL-TREATMENT OF CARCINOMA OF THE HEPATIC DUCT CONFLUENCE - ANALYSIS OF 55 RESECTED CARCINOMAS [J].
OGURA, Y ;
MIZUMOTO, R ;
TABATA, M ;
MATSUDA, S ;
KUSUDA, T .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1993, 17 (01) :85-93
[37]  
OUCHI K, 1989, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V124, P248
[38]   RADICAL RESECTION AND LIVER GRAFTING AS THE 2 MAIN COMPONENTS OF SURGICAL STRATEGY IN THE TREATMENT OF PROXIMAL BILE-DUCT CANCER [J].
PICHLMAYR, R ;
RINGE, B ;
LAUCHART, W ;
BECHSTEIN, WO ;
GUBERNATIS, G ;
WAGNER, E .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1988, 12 (01) :68-77
[39]   Surgical treatment in proximal bile duct cancer - A single-center experience [J].
Pichlmayr, R ;
Weimann, A ;
Klempnauer, J ;
Oldhafer, KJ ;
Maschek, H ;
Tusch, G ;
Ringe, B .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1996, 224 (05) :628-638
[40]   EXTENDED RIGHT HEPATIC LOBECTOMY, LEFT HEPATIC LOBECTOMY, AND SKELETONIZATION RESECTION FOR PROXIMAL BILE-DUCT CANCER [J].
PINSON, CW ;
ROSSI, RL .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1988, 12 (01) :52-59