What is the outcome of treatment for osteolysis?

被引:12
作者
Maloney, William [1 ]
Rosenberg, Aaron [2 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Rush Med Coll, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
关键词
D O I
10.5435/00124635-200800001-00007
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Periprosthetic osteolysis secondary to wear-induced particle generation is a common long-term complication of hip and knee replacement and frequently results in the need for revision surgery. Management of significant bone defects remains a surgical challenge. Surgical intervention must address the wear particle generator (usually, but not always, the bearing surface), the osteolytic, defects, and implant-related issues, primarily fixation and alignment. Indications for surgical intervention in the absence of loosening and pain are not well established. In general, patient age and activity level, the location and size of the osteolytic defect, and the clinical record of the implant system will dictate treatment choices.
引用
收藏
页码:S26 / S32
页数:7
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]
The effectiveness of isolated tibial insert exchange in revision total knee arthroplasty [J].
Babis, GC ;
Trousdale, RT ;
Morrey, BF .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2002, 84A (01) :64-68
[2]
Management of bone loss - Structural grafts in revision total knee arthroplasty [J].
Backstein, David ;
Safir, Oleg ;
Gross, Allan .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2006, (446) :104-112
[3]
The effect of stem design on end-of-stem pain in revision total knee arthroplasty [J].
Barrack, RL ;
Stanley, T ;
Burt, M ;
Hopkins, S .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2004, 19 (07) :119-124
[4]
Benson ER, 2000, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P58
[5]
BERRY DJ, 1993, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P204
[6]
Distal femoral allograft reconstruction for massive osteolytic bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty [J].
Bezwada, HP ;
Shah, AR ;
Zambito, K ;
Cerynik, DL ;
Johanson, NA .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2006, 21 (02) :242-248
[7]
Acetabular revision with the contour antiprotrusio cage - 2-to 5-year followup [J].
Bostrom, Mathias P. ;
Lehman, Andrew P. ;
Buly, Robert L. ;
Lyman, Stephen ;
Nestor, Bryan J. .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2006, (453) :188-194
[8]
The optimal strategy for stable tibial fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty [J].
Conditt, MA ;
Parsley, BS ;
Alexander, JW ;
Doherty, SD ;
Noble, PC .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2004, 19 (07) :113-118
[9]
Management of massive acetabular defects in revision total hip arthroplasty [J].
Dennis, DA .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2003, 18 (03) :121-125
[10]
Treatment of major defects of bone with bulk allografts and stemmed components during total knee arthroplasty [J].
Engh, GA ;
Herzwurm, PJ ;
Parks, NL .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1997, 79A (07) :1030-1039