Why We Can No Longer Ignore Consecutive Disasters

被引:174
作者
de Ruiter, Marleen C. [1 ]
Couasnon, Anais [1 ]
van den Homberg, Marc J. C. [2 ]
Daniell, James E. [3 ,4 ]
Gill, Joel C. [5 ]
Ward, Philip J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Inst Environm Studies IVM, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Netherlands Red Cross, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Karlsruhe Inst Technol KIT, Geophys Inst, Karlsruhe, Germany
[4] Karlsruhe Inst Technol KIT, Ctr Disaster Management & Risk Reduct Technol, Karlsruhe, Germany
[5] British Geol Survey, Keyworth, Notts, England
关键词
Multi-hazard; Multi-risk; consecutive disasters; compound disasters; extreme events; MULTI-HAZARD RISK; NATURAL DISASTERS; FRAGILITY ANALYSIS; CLIMATE; FLOOD; VULNERABILITY; MANAGEMENT; COMPOUND; EARTHQUAKE; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1029/2019EF001425
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In recent decades, a striking number of countries have suffered from consecutive disasters: events whose impacts overlap both spatially and temporally, while recovery is still under way. The risk of consecutive disasters will increase due to growing exposure, the interconnectedness of human society, and the increased frequency and intensity of nontectonic hazard. This paper provides an overview of the different types of consecutive disasters, their causes, and impacts. The impacts can be distinctly different from disasters occurring in isolation (both spatially and temporally) from other disasters, noting that full isolation never occurs. We use existing empirical disaster databases to show the global probabilistic occurrence for selected hazard types. Current state-of-the art risk assessment models and their outputs do not allow for a thorough representation and analysis of consecutive disasters. This is mainly due to the many challenges that are introduced by addressing and combining hazards of different nature, and accounting for their interactions and dynamics. Disaster risk management needs to be more holistic and codesigned between researchers, policy makers, first responders, and companies.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 144 条
  • [71] Probabilistic assessment of structural damage from coupled multi-hazards
    Korswagen, P. A.
    Jonkman, S. N.
    Terwel, K. C.
    [J]. STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2019, 76 : 135 - 148
  • [72] Krausmann E, 2017, NATECH RISK ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT: REDUCING THE RISK OF NATURAL-HAZARD IMPACT ON HAZARDOUS INSTALLATIONS, P119, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-803807-9.00008-5
  • [73] Coasts: the high-risk areas of the world
    Kron, Wolfgang
    [J]. NATURAL HAZARDS, 2013, 66 (03) : 1363 - 1382
  • [74] Probabilistic cost-benefit analysis of disaster risk management in a development context
    Kull, Daniel
    Mechler, Reinhard
    Hochrainer-Stigler, Stefan
    [J]. DISASTERS, 2013, 37 (03) : 374 - 400
  • [75] Kunreuther Howard, 2005, Foundations and Trends in Microeconomics, V1, P63, DOI 10.1561/0700000002
  • [76] LeComte D., 2019, WEATHERWISE, V72, P24, DOI [10.1080/00431672.2019.1586501, DOI 10.1080/00431672.2019.1586501]
  • [77] Fragility analysis of woodframe buildings considering combined snow and earthquake loading
    Lee, KH
    Rosowsky, DV
    [J]. STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2006, 28 (03) : 289 - 303
  • [78] A compound event framework for understanding extreme impacts
    Leonard, Michael
    Westra, Seth
    Phatak, Aloke
    Lambert, Martin
    van den Hurk, Bart
    McInnes, Kathleen
    Risbey, James
    Schuster, Sandra
    Jakob, Doerte
    Stafford-Smith, Mark
    [J]. WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-CLIMATE CHANGE, 2014, 5 (01) : 113 - 128
  • [79] The Linkage of the Large-Scale Circulation Pattern to a Long-Lived Heatwave over Mideastern China in 2018
    Li, Muyuan
    Yao, Yao
    Luo, Dehai
    Zhong, Linhao
    [J]. ATMOSPHERE, 2019, 10 (02)
  • [80] A three-level framework for multi-risk assessment
    Liu, Zhongqiang
    Nadim, Farrokh
    Garcia-Aristizabal, Alexander
    Mignan, Arnaud
    Fleming, Kevin
    Luna, Byron Quan
    [J]. GEORISK-ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT OF RISK FOR ENGINEERED SYSTEMS AND GEOHAZARDS, 2015, 9 (02) : 59 - 74