Defensive pride and consensus: Strength in imaginary numbers

被引:89
作者
McGregor, I
Nail, PR
Marigold, DC
Kang, SJ
机构
[1] York Univ, Dept Psychol, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada
[2] Univ Cent Arkansas, Psychol & Counseling Dept, Conway, AR USA
[3] Univ Waterloo, Dept Psychol, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
关键词
threat; implicit self-esteem; attachment style; narcissism; defensive consensus;
D O I
10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.978
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Failure (Study 1) and attachment separation thoughts (Study 2) caused exaggerated consensus estimates for personal beliefs about unrelated social issues. This compensatory consensus effect was most pronounced among defensively proud individuals, that is, among those with the combination of high explicit and low implicit self-esteem (Study 1) and the combination of high attachment avoidance and low attachment anxiety (Study 2). In Study 3, another form of defensive pride, narcissism, was associated with exaggerated consensual worldview defense after a system-injustice threat. In Study 4, imagined consensus reduced subjective salience of proud individuals' troubling thoughts. Compensatory consensus is seen as a kind of defensive self-affirmation that defensively proud people turn to for insulation from distressing thoughts.
引用
收藏
页码:978 / 996
页数:19
相关论文
共 137 条
[31]   Prejudice as self-image maintenance: Affirming the self through derogating others [J].
Fein, S ;
Spencer, SJ .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 73 (01) :31-44
[32]   Adult attachment and the suppression of unwanted thoughts [J].
Fraley, RC ;
Shaver, PR .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 73 (05) :1080-1091
[33]   Effects of motivational cues on perceptual asymmetry:: Implications for creativity and analytical problem solving [J].
Friedman, RS ;
Förster, J .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 88 (02) :263-275
[34]   Personality characteristics associated with romantic attachment: A comparison of interview and self-report methodologies [J].
Gjerde, PF ;
Onishi, M ;
Carlson, KS .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2004, 30 (11) :1402-1415
[35]   TERROR MANAGEMENT AND TOLERANCE - DOES MORTALITY SALIENCE ALWAYS INTENSIFY NEGATIVE REACTIONS TO OTHERS WHO THREATEN ONES WORLDVIEW [J].
GREENBERG, J ;
SIMON, L ;
PYSZCZYNSKI, T ;
SOLOMON, S ;
CHATEL, D .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 63 (02) :212-220
[36]   Terror management theory of self-esteem and cultural worldviews: Empirical assessments and conceptual refinements [J].
Greenberg, J ;
Solomon, S ;
Pyszczynski, T .
ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 29, 1997, 29 :61-139
[37]   Clarifying the function of mortality salience-induced worldview defense: Renewed suppression or reduced accessibility of death-related thoughts? [J].
Greenberg, J ;
Arndt, J ;
Schimel, J ;
Pyszczynski, T ;
Solomon, S .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 37 (01) :70-76
[38]   IMPLICIT SOCIAL COGNITION - ATTITUDES, SELF-ESTEEM, AND STEREOTYPES [J].
GREENWALD, AG ;
BANAJI, MR .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1995, 102 (01) :4-27
[39]   Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test [J].
Greenwald, AG ;
McGhee, DE ;
Schwartz, JLK .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 74 (06) :1464-1480
[40]  
GREENWALD AG, 2000, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V79, P102