A decision algorithm for patch spraying

被引:32
作者
Christensen, S
Heisel, T
Walter, AM
Graglia, E
机构
[1] Danish Inst Agr Sci, Res Ctr Bygholm, Dept Agr Engn, DK-8700 Horsens, Denmark
[2] Danish Inst Agr Sci, Res Ctr Flakkebjerg, Dept Crop Protect, Slagelse, Denmark
关键词
decision algorithms; patch spraying; weed management; economic optimal herbicide dose; cereals;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-3180.2003.00344.x
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
It has been established that weeds are spatially aggregated with a spatially varying composition of weed species within agricultural fields. Site-specific spraying therefore requires a decision method that includes the spatial variation of the weed composition and density. A computerized decision method that estimates an economic optimal herbicide dose according to site-specific weed composition and density is presented in this paper. The method was termed a 'decision algorithm for patch spraying' (DAPS) and was evaluated in a 5-year experiment, in Denmark. DAPS consists of a competition model, a herbicide dose-response model and an algorithm that estimates the economically optimal doses. The experiment was designed to compare herbicide treatments with DAPS recommendations and the Danish decision support system PC-Plant Protection. The results did not show any significant grain yield difference between DAPS and PC-Plant Protection; however, the recommended herbicide doses were significantly lower when using DAPS than PC-Plant Protection in all years. The main difference between the two decision models is that DAPS integrates crop-weed competition and estimates the net return as a continuous function of herbicide dose. The hypothesis tested is that the benefit of using lower herbicide doses recommended by DAPS would disappear after a few years because weed density will increase and thus require higher doses. However, the results of weed counting every year did not confirm this hypothesis.
引用
收藏
页码:276 / 284
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   OPERATIONAL-RESEARCH ANALYSIS OF PATCH SPRAYING [J].
AUDSLEY, E .
CROP PROTECTION, 1993, 12 (02) :111-119
[2]   DENSITY EQUIVALENT - A METHOD FOR FORECASTING YIELD LOSS CAUSED BY MIXED WEED POPULATIONS [J].
BERTI, A ;
ZANIN, G .
WEED RESEARCH, 1994, 34 (05) :327-332
[3]   GESTINF: A decision model for post-emergence weed management in soybean (Glycine max (L) Merr) [J].
Berti, A ;
Zanin, G .
CROP PROTECTION, 1997, 16 (02) :109-116
[4]   Field evaluation of a bioeconomic model for weed management in soybean (Glycine max) [J].
Buhler, DD ;
King, RP ;
Swinton, SM ;
Gunsolus, JL ;
Forcella, F .
WEED SCIENCE, 1997, 45 (01) :158-165
[5]   Field evaluation of a bioeconomic model for weed management in corn (Zea mays) [J].
Buhler, DD ;
King, RP ;
Swinton, SM ;
Gunsolus, JL ;
Forcella, F .
WEED SCIENCE, 1996, 44 (04) :915-923
[6]   CROP-WEED COMPETITION AND HERBICIDE PERFORMANCE IN CEREAL SPECIES AND VARIETIES [J].
CHRISTENSEN, S .
WEED RESEARCH, 1994, 34 (01) :29-36
[7]  
CHRISTENSEN S, 1995, WEED RES, V35, P241, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3180.1995.tb01786.x
[8]  
Cohen J., 1998, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, V2nd
[10]   Multi-year validation of a decision aid for integrated weed management in row crops [J].
Forcella, F ;
King, RP ;
Swinton, SM ;
Buhler, DD ;
Gunsolus, JL .
WEED SCIENCE, 1996, 44 (03) :650-661