A decision algorithm for patch spraying

被引:32
作者
Christensen, S
Heisel, T
Walter, AM
Graglia, E
机构
[1] Danish Inst Agr Sci, Res Ctr Bygholm, Dept Agr Engn, DK-8700 Horsens, Denmark
[2] Danish Inst Agr Sci, Res Ctr Flakkebjerg, Dept Crop Protect, Slagelse, Denmark
关键词
decision algorithms; patch spraying; weed management; economic optimal herbicide dose; cereals;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-3180.2003.00344.x
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
It has been established that weeds are spatially aggregated with a spatially varying composition of weed species within agricultural fields. Site-specific spraying therefore requires a decision method that includes the spatial variation of the weed composition and density. A computerized decision method that estimates an economic optimal herbicide dose according to site-specific weed composition and density is presented in this paper. The method was termed a 'decision algorithm for patch spraying' (DAPS) and was evaluated in a 5-year experiment, in Denmark. DAPS consists of a competition model, a herbicide dose-response model and an algorithm that estimates the economically optimal doses. The experiment was designed to compare herbicide treatments with DAPS recommendations and the Danish decision support system PC-Plant Protection. The results did not show any significant grain yield difference between DAPS and PC-Plant Protection; however, the recommended herbicide doses were significantly lower when using DAPS than PC-Plant Protection in all years. The main difference between the two decision models is that DAPS integrates crop-weed competition and estimates the net return as a continuous function of herbicide dose. The hypothesis tested is that the benefit of using lower herbicide doses recommended by DAPS would disappear after a few years because weed density will increase and thus require higher doses. However, the results of weed counting every year did not confirm this hypothesis.
引用
收藏
页码:276 / 284
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
[21]  
Lutman PJW, 2000, WEED RES, V40, P255, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-3180.2000.00182.x
[22]  
LUTMAN PJW, 1999, ASPECTS APPL BIOL, V56, P105
[23]  
Medlin CR, 2000, WEED SCI, V48, P653, DOI 10.1614/0043-1745(2000)048[0653:ECOBAS]2.0.CO
[24]  
2
[25]   MIXTURES OF WILD OATS (AVENA-FATUA) AND RYEGRASS (LOLIUM-RIGIDUM) IN WHEAT - COMPETITION AND OPTIMAL ECONOMIC-CONTROL [J].
PANNELL, DJ ;
GILL, GS .
CROP PROTECTION, 1994, 13 (05) :371-375
[26]   AN ECONOMIC RESPONSE MODEL OF HERBICIDE APPLICATION FOR WEED-CONTROL [J].
PANNELL, DJ .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1990, 34 (03) :223-241
[27]  
Rydahl P., 1993, Bulletin OEPP (Organisation Europeenne et Mediterraneenne pour la Protection des Plantes), V23, P589, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2338.1993.tb00554.x
[28]  
Scott GH, 2001, WEED SCI, V49, P549, DOI 10.1614/0043-1745(2001)049[0549:EEOHCP]2.0.CO
[29]  
2
[30]   SELOMA - EXPERT-SYSTEM FOR WEED MANAGEMENT IN HERBICIDE-INTENSIVE CROPS [J].
STIGLIANI, L ;
RESINA, C .
WEED TECHNOLOGY, 1993, 7 (03) :550-559