Comparison of different concentrations of levobupivacaine for post-operative epidural analgesia

被引:26
作者
Dernedde, M [1 ]
Stadler, M [1 ]
Bardiau, F [1 ]
Boogaerts, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Ctr, Dept Anaesthesiol, B-6000 Charleroi, Belgium
关键词
local anesthetics; levobupivacaine; dose; concentration; pain; post-operative; anesthetic techniques; epidural;
D O I
10.1034/j.1399-6576.2003.00182.x
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: The relative effects of the mass, volume and concentration of local anaesthetic solution used for epidural anaesthesia and analgesia are still under debate. Clinical studies have shown discrepancies, probably because of limited consideration of total dose. Methods: This prospective, randomized and blinded study evaluated the spread, the quality of post-operative analgesia and the incidence of side-effects of continuous thoracic epidural levobupivacaine 15 mg/h in three different concentrations: 1.5 mg/ml, 10 ml/h (n = 26), 5 mg/ml, 3 ml/h (n = 33) or 7.5 mg/ml, 2 ml/h (n = 31). The following variables were registered within 48 h: sensory block, pain scores, rescue morphine consumption, motor blockade, haemodynamics, sedation, nausea and vomiting, and patient satisfaction. Results: The three groups were similar with regard to demographics, quality of analgesia, morphine consumption, and satisfaction rate. The upper level of sensory block was two segments higher in the 1.5 mg/ml group. Motor blockade in the lower limbs was low in the three groups. Haemodynamic profile was more stable in the higher concentration groups compared with the 1.5 mg/ml patient group (P < 0.001). Nausea was more frequent in the 1.5 mg/ml group (P = 0.02). Conclusion: The same dose of levobupivacaine provides an equal quality of analgesia in low or high volume continuous thoracic epidural infusion with reduced haemodynamic instability and nausea in the low volume/high concentration groups.
引用
收藏
页码:884 / 890
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
[21]  
PIERCE ET, 1989, REGION ANESTH, V14, P31
[22]   ANESTHETIC FACTORS CONTRIBUTING TO POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA AND VOMITING [J].
RABEY, PG ;
SMITH, G .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1992, 69 (07) :S40-S45
[23]   THORACIC EPIDURAL ANALGESIA .2. PROLONGATION IN EARLY POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD BY CONTINUOUS INJECTION OF 1.0PERCENT BUPIVACAINE [J].
RENCK, H ;
EDSTROM, H ;
KINNBERGER, B ;
BRANDT, G .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1976, 20 (01) :47-56
[24]   Concentration of lidocaine affects intensity of sensory block during lumbar epidural anesthesia [J].
Sakura, S ;
Sumi, M ;
Kushizaki, H ;
Saito, Y ;
Kosaka, Y .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1999, 88 (01) :123-127
[25]   EPIDURAL ROPIVACAINE INFUSION FOR POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA AFTER MAJOR LOWER ABDOMINAL-SURGERY - A DOSE-FINDING STUDY [J].
SCOTT, DA ;
CHAMLEY, DM ;
MOONEY, PH ;
DEAM, RK ;
MARK, AH ;
HAGGLOF, B .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1995, 81 (05) :982-986
[26]   EFFECTS OF CONCENTRATION OF LOCAL-ANESTHETIC DRUGS IN EXTRADURAL BLOCK [J].
SCOTT, DB ;
MCCLURE, JH ;
GIASI, RM ;
SEO, J ;
COVINO, BG .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1980, 52 (10) :1033-1037
[27]  
SNIJDELAAR DG, 1994, ANESTH ANALG, V78, P490
[28]   Difference in risk factors for postoperative nausea and vomiting [J].
Stadler, M ;
Bardiau, F ;
Seidel, L ;
Albert, A ;
Boogaerts, JG .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2003, 98 (01) :46-52
[29]   Safety and efficacy of postoperative epidural analgesia [J].
Wheatley, RG ;
Schug, SA ;
Watson, D .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2001, 87 (01) :47-61
[30]   Epidural ropivacaine with fentanyl following major gynaecological surgery: the effect of volume and concentration on pain relief and motor impairment [J].
Whiteside, R ;
Jones, D ;
Bignell, S ;
Lang, C ;
Lo, SK .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2000, 84 (06) :720-724