Phase II study of vinorelbine in patients with androgen-independent prostate cancer

被引:35
作者
Oudard, S
Caty, A
Humblet, Y
Beauduin, M
Suc, E
Piccart, M
Rolland, F
Fumoleau, P
Bugat, R
Houyau, P
Monnier, A
Sun, X
Montcuquet, P
Breza, J
Novak, J
Gil, T
Chopin, D
机构
[1] Hop Eruopeen Georges Pompidou, Div Oncol, Dept Oncol, F-75015 Paris, France
[2] Oncol Oscar Lambert Ctr, Lille, France
[3] St Luc Hosp, Brussels, Belgium
[4] Jolimont Hosp, Haine St Paul, France
[5] St Jean Languedoc Clin, Dept Oncol, Toulouse, France
[6] Oncol Jules Bordet Ctr, Brussels, Belgium
[7] Oncol Rene Gauducheau Ctr, St Herblain, France
[8] Claudius Regaud Ctr, Toulouse, France
[9] Hop andre Boulloche, Dept Oncol, Montbeliard, France
[10] St Vincent Clin, Besancon, France
[11] Dept Urol, Bratislava, Slovakia
[12] Dept Urol, Prague, Czech Republic
[13] Hop Henri Mondor, Dept Urol, F-94010 Creteil, France
关键词
chemotherapy; hormone resistance; phase II study; prostate cancer; prostate specific antigen (PSA); vinorelbine;
D O I
10.1023/A:1011141611560
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of vinorelbine in a phase II study in patients with progressive metastatic androgen-independent prostate cancer. Patients and methods: Forty-seven men with progressive metastatic prostate cancer refractory to first-line or second-line hormonal therapy were treated with vinorelbine, a semi-synthetic vinca-alkaloid. Vinorelbine was given, on an outpatient schedule, at 25 mg/m(2) weekly for at least eight weeks or until progression or excessive toxicity. Results: Forty-seven patients were included in the study, 33 being evaluable for tumour response, 36 for response to PSA, 21 for clinical benefit and 45 for toxicity. Median actual weekly dose was 19 mg/m(2) (range 12.0-26.2 mg/m(2)). Six of thirty-six patients (17%) demonstrated a biologic response with a 50% or more decline in serum PSA on two consecutive measurements taken at least two weeks apart. The median duration of biologic response was 2.7 months. Two of three patients with measurable disease obtained an objective response but remained unconfirmed. No change disease was reported in 23 patients (49%). On entry into the study, 30 patients had symptomatic bone pain and required narcotic or non-narcotic analgesics. Clinical benefit from vinorelbine was achieved in 15 patients out of 21 (32% of the intent to treat analysis population and 71% of the assessable patients). Due to the low number of questionnaires (QLQ-C30) filled in, it was insufficient to allow any statistical analysis. The median survival was 10.2 months. Toxicity was mainly haematologic with 51% of patients experiencing grade 3 or 4 granulocytopenia. Three patients developed deep vein thrombosis. Non-haematologic toxicity, mainly nausea and neurotoxicity, was mild. Conclusion: The administration of weekly vinorelbine appears to be a safe treatment for those patients with androgen-independent prostate cancer and poor prognosis features who require chemotherapy. These results provide data for future investigation of vinorelbine in combination regimens.
引用
收藏
页码:847 / 852
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Eligibility and response guidelines for phase II clinical trials in androgen-independent prostate cancer: Recommendations from the prostate-specific antigen working group [J].
Bubley, GJ ;
Carducci, M ;
Dahut, W ;
Dawson, N ;
Daliani, D ;
Eisenberger, M ;
Figg, WD ;
Freidlin, B ;
Halabi, S ;
Hudes, G ;
Hussain, M ;
Kaplan, R ;
Myers, C ;
Oh, W ;
Petrylak, DP ;
Reed, E ;
Roth, B ;
Sartor, O ;
Scher, H ;
Simons, J ;
Sinibaldi, V ;
Small, EJ ;
Smith, MR ;
Trump, DL ;
Vollmer, R ;
Wilding, G .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (11) :3461-3467
[2]   Phase II study of estramustine and vinorelbine in hormone-refractory prostate carcinoma patients [J].
Carles, J ;
Domenech, M ;
Gelabert-Mas, A ;
Nogue, M ;
Tabernero, JM ;
Arcusa, A ;
Guasch, I ;
Miguel, A ;
Ballesteros, JJ ;
Fabregat, X .
ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 1998, 37 (02) :187-191
[3]   A PHASE-II STUDY OF NAVELBINE (VINORELBINE) IN THE TREATMENT OF NON SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER [J].
DEPIERRE, A ;
LEMARIE, E ;
DABOUIS, G ;
GARNIER, G ;
JACOULET, P ;
DALPHIN, JC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 1991, 14 (02) :115-119
[4]  
DEXEUS F, 1985, CANCER TREAT REP, V69, P885
[5]   EFFECTS OF HIGH-DOSE KETOCONAZOLE IN PATIENTS WITH ANDROGEN-INDEPENDENT PROSTATIC-CANCER [J].
EICHENBERGER, T ;
TRACHTENBERG, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 1988, 11 :S104-S107
[6]  
EISENBERGER M A, 1988, NCI (National Cancer Institute) Monographs, P151
[7]  
EISENBERGER MA, 1995, CANCER, V75, P1927, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19950401)75:7+<1927::AID-CNCR2820751628>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-A
[9]   Improvements in clinical benefit with vinorelbine in the treatment of hormone-refractory prostate cancer: A phase II trial [J].
Fields-Jones, S ;
Koletsky, A ;
Wilding, G ;
O'Rourke, M ;
O'Rourke, T ;
Eckardt, J ;
Yates, B ;
McGuirt, C ;
Burris, HA .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1999, 10 (11) :1307-1310
[10]  
Goktas S, 1999, SEMIN ONCOL, V26, P162