Phase II study of vinorelbine in patients with androgen-independent prostate cancer

被引:35
作者
Oudard, S
Caty, A
Humblet, Y
Beauduin, M
Suc, E
Piccart, M
Rolland, F
Fumoleau, P
Bugat, R
Houyau, P
Monnier, A
Sun, X
Montcuquet, P
Breza, J
Novak, J
Gil, T
Chopin, D
机构
[1] Hop Eruopeen Georges Pompidou, Div Oncol, Dept Oncol, F-75015 Paris, France
[2] Oncol Oscar Lambert Ctr, Lille, France
[3] St Luc Hosp, Brussels, Belgium
[4] Jolimont Hosp, Haine St Paul, France
[5] St Jean Languedoc Clin, Dept Oncol, Toulouse, France
[6] Oncol Jules Bordet Ctr, Brussels, Belgium
[7] Oncol Rene Gauducheau Ctr, St Herblain, France
[8] Claudius Regaud Ctr, Toulouse, France
[9] Hop andre Boulloche, Dept Oncol, Montbeliard, France
[10] St Vincent Clin, Besancon, France
[11] Dept Urol, Bratislava, Slovakia
[12] Dept Urol, Prague, Czech Republic
[13] Hop Henri Mondor, Dept Urol, F-94010 Creteil, France
关键词
chemotherapy; hormone resistance; phase II study; prostate cancer; prostate specific antigen (PSA); vinorelbine;
D O I
10.1023/A:1011141611560
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of vinorelbine in a phase II study in patients with progressive metastatic androgen-independent prostate cancer. Patients and methods: Forty-seven men with progressive metastatic prostate cancer refractory to first-line or second-line hormonal therapy were treated with vinorelbine, a semi-synthetic vinca-alkaloid. Vinorelbine was given, on an outpatient schedule, at 25 mg/m(2) weekly for at least eight weeks or until progression or excessive toxicity. Results: Forty-seven patients were included in the study, 33 being evaluable for tumour response, 36 for response to PSA, 21 for clinical benefit and 45 for toxicity. Median actual weekly dose was 19 mg/m(2) (range 12.0-26.2 mg/m(2)). Six of thirty-six patients (17%) demonstrated a biologic response with a 50% or more decline in serum PSA on two consecutive measurements taken at least two weeks apart. The median duration of biologic response was 2.7 months. Two of three patients with measurable disease obtained an objective response but remained unconfirmed. No change disease was reported in 23 patients (49%). On entry into the study, 30 patients had symptomatic bone pain and required narcotic or non-narcotic analgesics. Clinical benefit from vinorelbine was achieved in 15 patients out of 21 (32% of the intent to treat analysis population and 71% of the assessable patients). Due to the low number of questionnaires (QLQ-C30) filled in, it was insufficient to allow any statistical analysis. The median survival was 10.2 months. Toxicity was mainly haematologic with 51% of patients experiencing grade 3 or 4 granulocytopenia. Three patients developed deep vein thrombosis. Non-haematologic toxicity, mainly nausea and neurotoxicity, was mild. Conclusion: The administration of weekly vinorelbine appears to be a safe treatment for those patients with androgen-independent prostate cancer and poor prognosis features who require chemotherapy. These results provide data for future investigation of vinorelbine in combination regimens.
引用
收藏
页码:847 / 852
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[11]   Vinblastine versus vinblastine plus oral estramustine phosphate for patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer: A Hoosier Oncology Group and Fox Chase network phase III trial [J].
Hudes, G ;
Einhorn, L ;
Ross, E ;
Balsham, A ;
Loehrer, P ;
Ramsey, H ;
Sprandio, J ;
Entmacher, M ;
Dugan, W ;
Ansari, R ;
Monaco, F ;
Hanna, M ;
Roth, B .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (10) :3160-3166
[12]  
KANTOFF PW, 1995, SEMIN ONCOL, V22, P32
[13]   PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN AS A MEASURE OF DISEASE OUTCOME IN METASTATIC HORMONE-REFRACTORY PROSTATE-CANCER [J].
KELLY, WK ;
SCHER, HI ;
MAZUMDAR, M ;
VLAMIS, V ;
SCHWARTZ, M ;
FOSSA, SD .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1993, 11 (04) :607-615
[14]   RANDOMIZED STUDY OF VINORELBINE AND CISPLATIN VERSUS VINDESINE AND CISPLATIN VERSUS VINORELBINE ALONE IN ADVANCED NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER - RESULTS OF A EUROPEAN MULTICENTER TRIAL INCLUDING 612 PATIENTS [J].
LECHEVALIER, T ;
BRISGAND, D ;
DOUILLARD, JY ;
PUJOL, JL ;
ALBEROLA, V ;
MONNIER, A ;
RIVIERE, A ;
LIANES, P ;
CHOMY, P ;
CIGOLARI, S ;
GOTTFRIED, M ;
RUFFIE, P ;
PANIZO, A ;
GASPARD, MH ;
RAVAIOLI, A ;
BESENVAL, M ;
BESSEN, F ;
MARTINEZ, A ;
BERTHAUD, P ;
TURSZ, T .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1994, 12 (02) :360-367
[15]  
Marty M, 1992, Drugs, V44 Suppl 4, P29
[16]   USE OF PALLIATIVE END-POINTS TO EVALUATE THE EFFECTS OF MITOXANTRONE AND LOW-DOSE PREDNISONE IN PATIENTS WITH HORMONALLY RESISTANT PROSTATE-CANCER [J].
MOORE, MJ ;
OSOBA, D ;
MURPHY, K ;
TANNOCK, IF ;
ARMITAGE, A ;
FINDLAY, B ;
COPPIN, C ;
NEVILLE, A ;
VENNER, P ;
WILSON, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1994, 12 (04) :689-694
[17]   Management of hormone refractory prostate cancer: Current standards and future prospects [J].
Oh, WK ;
Kantoff, PW .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 160 (04) :1220-1229
[18]   Cancer statistics, 1997 [J].
Parker, SL ;
Tong, T ;
Bolden, S ;
Wingo, PA .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 1997, 47 (01) :5-27
[19]   INHIBITION OF PROSTATE-CANCER GROWTH BY VINBLASTINE AND TAMOXIFEN [J].
PIENTA, KJ ;
REPLOGLE, T ;
LEHR, JE .
PROSTATE, 1995, 26 (05) :270-274
[20]   Treatment of human prostate tumors PC-3 and TSU-PR1 with standard and investigational agents in SCID mice [J].
Polin, L ;
Valeriote, F ;
White, K ;
Panchapor, C ;
Pugh, S ;
Knight, J ;
LoRusso, P ;
Hussain, M ;
Liversidge, E ;
Peltier, N ;
Golakoti, T ;
Patterson, G ;
Moore, R ;
Corbett, TH .
INVESTIGATIONAL NEW DRUGS, 1997, 15 (02) :99-108