RETRACTED: Technology development projects in road infrastructure: The relevance of government championing behavior (Retracted Article)

被引:20
作者
Caerteling, Jasper S. [1 ]
Di Benedetto, C. Anthony [2 ,3 ]
Doree, Andre G. [1 ]
Halman, Johannes I. M. [1 ]
Song, Michael [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Twente, Dept Construct Engn & Management, NL-7500 AE Enschede, Netherlands
[2] Temple Univ, Dept Mkt, Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA
[3] Tech Univ Eindhoven, NL-5600 MB Eindhoven, Netherlands
[4] Univ Missouri, Bloch Sch, Dept Global Entrepreneurship, Kansas City, MO 64110 USA
关键词
Championing behavior; Technology development; Low-technology industries; Road construction; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; MARKET ORIENTATION; PRODUCT INNOVATION; PERFORMANCE IMPLICATIONS; STRATEGIC ORIENTATION; DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS; CONTINGENCY APPROACH; DEVELOPMENT POLICY; ENERGY TECHNOLOGY; FIRM PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.technovation.2011.02.001
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Low-technology industries are largely neglected in technology management literature. Yet, recent studies show the crucial importance of innovation in low-technology industries. In this study, we analyze technology development projects in a specific low-technology industry, road infrastructure, being a major sector and an important contributor to both GDP and employment. We focus on the effect of government behavior on technology development projects in road infrastructure. In road infrastructure, government plays an important role as a buyer and first user of technology. Based on the business strategy literature and literature on technology policy, we test the relative importance of a firm's strategy and government behavior in this low-technology industry. Specifically, we build and empirically test a conceptual model in which government behaviors (technology championship and procurement policy) and strategic orientation (internal/cost orientation and innovation orientation) are antecedents to project performance, which is assessed in terms of performance relative to budget, quality, and time objectives, and also in terms of benefits to customers. Our empirical findings stress the value of government championing behavior and show that this behavior is more important than innovative procurement policies. The results even suggest that government championship is more important than a firm's strategic orientation. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:270 / 283
页数:14
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2009, OECD SCI TECHNOLOGY, DOI DOI 10.1787/STI_SCOREBOARD-2009-39-EN
[2]  
[Anonymous], EXPLORING BLACK BOX
[3]   MEASURING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF COMPETITION IN DEFENSE PROCUREMENT - A SURVEY OF THE EMPIRICAL LITERATURE [J].
ANTON, JJ ;
YAO, DA .
JOURNAL OF POLICY ANALYSIS AND MANAGEMENT, 1990, 9 (01) :60-79
[4]   Market orientation and the new product paradox [J].
Baker, WE ;
Sinkula, JM .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2005, 22 (06) :483-502
[6]  
Bender G, 2006, Final Report of the Project "Policy and Innovation in Low-Tech -Knowledge Formation, Employment & Growth Contributions of the 'Old Economy' Industries in Europe-PILOT
[7]   Technological regimes and Schumpeterian patterns of innovation [J].
Breschi, S ;
Malerba, F ;
Orsenigo, L .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2000, 110 (463) :388-410
[8]   Technology commercialization in road infrastructure:: How government affects the variation and appropriability of technology [J].
Caerteling, Jasper S. ;
Halman, Johannes I. M. ;
Doree, Andre G. .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2008, 25 (02) :143-161
[9]   MARKETING AND TECHNOLOGY - A STRATEGIC COALIGNMENT [J].
CAPON, N ;
GLAZER, R .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 1987, 51 (03) :1-14
[10]   The incumbent's curse? Incumbency, size, and radical product innovation [J].
Chandy, RK ;
Tellis, GJ .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2000, 64 (03) :1-17