Discrimination of prostate cancer from normal peripheral zone and central gland tissue by using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging

被引:281
作者
Engelbrecht, MR
Huisman, HJ
Laheij, RJF
Jager, GJ
van Leenders, GJLH
Hulsbergen-Van De Kaa, CA
de la Rosette, JJMCH
Blickman, JG
Barentsz, JO
机构
[1] Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[4] Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Urol, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
magnetic resonance (MR); tissue characterization; prostate neoplasms; MR;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2291020200
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To evaluate which parameters of dynamic magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and T2 relaxation rate would result in optimal discrimination of prostatic carcinoma from normal peripheral zone (PZ) and central gland (CG) tissues and to correlate these parameters with tumor stage, Gleason score, patient age, and tumor markers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 58 patients with prostatic carcinoma, 36 were included for analysis. Patients underwent MR imaging at 1.5 T with an endorectal-pelvic phased-array coil and subsequently underwent prostatectomy. A T2-weighted turbo spin-echo sequence, an intermediate-weighted sequence, and a fast T1-weighted gradient-echo sequence (seven sections in 2.03 seconds) during bolus injection of 0.1 mmol gadopentetate dimeglumine per kilogram of body weight were performed. Contrast agent concentration-time curves were obtained for prostatic carcinoma and normal PZ and CG tissue by using whole-mount sections to guide placement of regions of interest. Onset time, time to peak, peak enhancement, relative peak enhancement, washout, and T2 relaxation rates were calculated. Multivariate receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed with and without relative peak enhancement. RESULTS: Results of multivariate receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that relative peak enhancement demonstrated the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) in the PZ and the CG (AUC = 0.93, 0.82). Results of multivariate analysis without relative peak enhancement showed that relative peak enhancement in the PZ and washout in the CG demonstrated the highest AUC (AUC = 0.9, 0.81). Pearson correlation coefficients between the dynamic parameters or T2 relaxation rates in carcinoma and the tumor stage, Gleason score, patient age, and tumor markers ranged between 0.02 and 0.44. CONCLUSION: The optimal parameter for discrimination of prostatic carcinoma in the PZ and CG was relative peak enhancement. if relative peak enhancement was not used, then peak enhancement was optimal in the PZ, and washout was optimal in the CG. Poor-to-moderate correlation was present between the dynamic parameters or T2 relaxation rate in carcinoma and the tumor stage, Gleason score, patient age, tumor volume, and prostate-specific antigen. (C) RSNA, 2003.
引用
收藏
页码:248 / 254
页数:7
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Current status of minimally invasive treatment options for localized prostate carcinoma
    Beerlage, HP
    Thüroff, S
    Madersbacher, S
    Zlotta, AR
    Aus, G
    de Reijke, TM
    de la Rosette, JJMCH
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2000, 37 (01) : 2 - 13
  • [2] CONTRAST-ENHANCED ENDORECTAL COIL MRI IN LOCAL STAGING OF PROSTATE CARCINOMA
    BONI, RAH
    BONER, JA
    LUTOLF, UM
    TRINKLER, F
    PESTALOZZI, DM
    KRESTIN, GP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1995, 19 (02) : 232 - 237
  • [3] BRAWER MK, 1994, CANCER, V73, P678, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19940201)73:3<678::AID-CNCR2820730329>3.0.CO
  • [4] 2-6
  • [5] PHARMACOKINETIC PARAMETERS IN CNS GD-DTPA ENHANCED MR IMAGING
    BRIX, G
    SEMMLER, W
    PORT, R
    SCHAD, LR
    LAYER, G
    LORENZ, WJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1991, 15 (04) : 621 - 628
  • [6] THE ROLE OF INTRAVENOUS CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT IN MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING OF PROSTATIC-CARCINOMA
    BROWN, G
    MACVICAR, DA
    AYTON, V
    HUSBAND, JE
    [J]. CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 1995, 50 (09) : 601 - 606
  • [7] Evelhoch JL, 1999, JMRI-J MAGN RESON IM, V10, P254, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2586(199909)10:3<254::AID-JMRI5>3.0.CO
  • [8] 2-9
  • [9] Prostate cancer tumor grade differentiation with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in the rat: Comparison of macromolecular and small-molecular contrast media - Preliminary experience
    Gossmann, A
    Okuhata, Y
    Shames, DM
    Helbich, TH
    Roberts, TPL
    Wendland, MF
    Huber, S
    Brasch, RC
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1999, 213 (01) : 265 - 272
  • [10] METHOD FELL THE QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF CONTRAST AGENT UPTAKE IN DYNAMIC CONTRAST-ENHANCED MRT
    HITTMAIR, K
    GOMISCEK, G
    LANGENBERGER, K
    RECHT, M
    IMHOF, H
    KRAMER, J
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1994, 31 (05) : 567 - 571