Observed differences in diagnostic test accuracy between patient subgroups: Is it real or due to reference standard misclassification?

被引:19
作者
Biesheuvel, Corne
Irwig, Les
Bossuyt, Patrick
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Sch Publ Hlth, Screening & Test Evaluat Program, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1373/clinchem.2007.087403
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Before a new test is introduced in clinical practice, its accuracy should be assessed. In the past decade, researchers have put an increased emphasis on exploring differences in test sensitivity and specificity between patient subgroups. If the reference standard is imperfect and the prevalence of the target condition differs among subgroups, apparent differences in test sensitivity and specificity between subgroups may be caused by reference standard misclassification. We provide guidance on how to determine whether observed differences may be explained by reference standard misclassification. Such misclassification may be ascertained by examining how the apparent sensitivity and specificity change with the prevalence of the target condition in the subgroups. (C) 2007 American Association for Clinical Chemistry.
引用
收藏
页码:1725 / 1729
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   BIASES IN THE ASSESSMENT OF DIAGNOSTIC-TESTS [J].
BEGG, CB .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1987, 6 (04) :411-423
[2]   Towards complete and,accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative [J].
Bossuyt, PM ;
Reitsma, JB ;
Bruns, DE ;
Gatsonis, CA ;
Glasziou, PP ;
Irwig, LM ;
Lijmer, JG ;
Moher, D ;
Rennie, D ;
de Vet, HCE .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 326 (7379) :41-44
[3]   The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: Explanation and elaboration [J].
Bossuyt, PM ;
Reitsma, JB ;
Bruns, DE ;
Gatsonis, CA ;
Glasziou, PP ;
Irwig, LM ;
Moher, D ;
Rennie, D ;
de Vet, HCW ;
Lijmer, JG .
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2003, 49 (01) :7-18
[4]   REFERENCE TEST ERRORS BIAS THE EVALUATION OF DIAGNOSTIC-TESTS FOR ISCHEMIC HEART-DISEASE [J].
BOYKO, EJ ;
ALDERMAN, BW ;
BARON, AE .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1988, 3 (05) :476-481
[5]   COMPARISON OF A SCREENING TEST AND A REFERENCE TEST IN EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDIES .I. INDICES OF AGREEMENT AND THEIR RELATION TO PREVALENCE [J].
BUCK, AA ;
GART, JJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1966, 83 (03) :586-&
[6]   CARCINOEMBRYONIC ANTIGEN [J].
FLETCHER, RH .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1986, 104 (01) :66-73
[7]   COMPARISON OF A SCREENING TEST AND A REFERENCE TEST IN EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDIES .2. A PROBABILISTIC MODEL FOR COMPARISON OF DIAGNOSTIC TESTS [J].
GART, JJ ;
BUCK, AA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1966, 83 (03) :593-+
[8]   Evidence base of clinical diagnosis - Designing studies to ensure that estimates of test accuracy are transferable [J].
Irwig, L ;
Bossuyt, P ;
Glasziou, P ;
Gatsonis, C ;
Lijmer, J .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 324 (7338) :669-671
[9]  
Kelsey J.L., 1986, METHODS OBSERVATIONA, Vfirst
[10]   Evidence base of clinical diagnosis - Evaluation of diagnostic procedures [J].
Knottnerus, JA ;
van Weel, C ;
Muris, JWM .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 324 (7335) :477-480