Comparative genotoxic evaluation of 2-furylethylenes and 5-nitrofurans by using the comet assay in TK6 cells

被引:25
作者
Borroto, JIG [1 ]
Machado, GP [1 ]
Creus, A [1 ]
Marcos, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Fac Ciencias, Dept Genet & Microbiol, Grp Mutagenesi, Bellaterra 08193, Spain
关键词
D O I
10.1093/mutage/gei026
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
The genotoxicity of three 2-furylethylene derivatives and four 5-nitrofurans was evaluated by using the comet assay in human lymphoblastoid cultured TK6 cells. The 2-furylethylene derivatives were 2-furyl-1-nitroethene, 1-(5-bromofur-2-yl)-2-nitroethene and 1-(5-bromofur-2yl)-2-bromo-2-nitroethene, while the 5-nitrofurans were nitrofurantoin, nitrofurazone, furazolidone and 5-nitro-2-furanacrolein. The treatments lasted for 3 h in the absence of metabolic activation. No genotoxic effects were observed for two of the 2-furylethylene compounds, while the derivative 1-(5-bromofur-2-yl)-2-nitroethene showed a statistically significant response mainly at the highest concentration tested; this effect was considered biologically relevant and the compound was classified as slightly genotoxic. On the other hand, for the classical 5-nitrofurans tested there is a tendency towards a dose-related increase of the DNA damage in the comet assay and the observed increases for the parameters analysed (Olive tail moment, tail % DNA and tail length) were significant for all compounds. Then, the four 5-nitrofurans tested were considered genotoxic. These results show that the position of the nitro group influences the genotoxicity of the assayed compounds. Thus, in this comet assay, the 2-furylethylene derivatives having the nitro group attached outside the furan ring appear to be much less genotoxic than the 5-nitrofurans.
引用
收藏
页码:193 / 197
页数:5
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   CHROMOSOME ABERRATION AND SISTER CHROMATID EXCHANGE TEST-RESULTS WITH 42 CHEMICALS [J].
ANDERSON, BE ;
ZEIGER, E ;
SHELBY, MD ;
RESNICK, MA ;
GULATI, DK ;
IVETT, JL ;
LOVEDAY, KS .
ENVIRONMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MUTAGENESIS, 1990, 16 :55-137
[2]   In vitro evaluation of G1: a novel antimicrobial compound [J].
Blondeau, JM ;
Castanedo, N ;
Gonzalez, O ;
Mendina, R ;
Silveira, E .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 1999, 11 (02) :163-166
[3]   Genotoxicity testing of the furylethylene derivative 1-(5-bromofur-2-yl)-2-bromo-2-nitroethene in cultured human lymphocytes [J].
Borroto, JIG ;
Pérez, G ;
Creus, A ;
Marcos, R .
FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2004, 42 (02) :187-193
[4]   The mutagenic potential of the furylethylene derivative 2-furyl-1-nitroethene in the mouse bone marrow micronucleus test [J].
Borroto, JIG ;
Creus, A ;
Marcos, R ;
Mollà, R ;
Zapatero, J .
TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2003, 72 (02) :359-362
[5]   Genotoxic evaluation of the furylethylene derivative 1-(5-bromofur-2-yl)-2-nitroethene in cultured human lymphocytes [J].
Borroto, JIG ;
Creus, A ;
Marcos, R .
MUTATION RESEARCH-GENETIC TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MUTAGENESIS, 2002, 519 (1-2) :179-185
[6]   Genotoxic evaluation of the furylethylene derivative 2-furyl-1-nitroethene in cultured human lymphocytes [J].
Borroto, JIG ;
Creus, A ;
Marcos, R .
MUTATION RESEARCH-GENETIC TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MUTAGENESIS, 2001, 497 (1-2) :177-184
[7]   Structure-mutagenicity relationships in 2-furylethylene derivatives. A molecular orbital study of the role of nitro groups [J].
Estrada, E .
MUTATION RESEARCH-GENETIC TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MUTAGENESIS, 1998, 420 (1-3) :67-75
[8]   THE COMET ASSAY - A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW [J].
FAIRBAIRN, DW ;
OLIVE, PL ;
ONEILL, KL .
MUTATION RESEARCH-REVIEWS IN GENETIC TOXICOLOGY, 1995, 339 (01) :37-59
[9]   STUDIES ON THE EFFECT OF ASCORBIC-ACID AND SELENIUM ON THE GENOTOXICITY OF NITROFURANS - NITROFURAZONE AND FURAZOLIDONE [J].
GAJEWSKA, J ;
SZCZYPKA, M ;
TUDEK, B ;
SZYMCZYK, T .
MUTATION RESEARCH, 1990, 232 (02) :191-197
[10]   Rate conservation laws for multidimensional processes of bounded variation with applications to priority queueing systems [J].
Guillemin, F ;
Mazumdar, R .
METHODOLOGY AND COMPUTING IN APPLIED PROBABILITY, 2004, 6 (02) :135-159