Aspirin for primary prevention of coronary heart disease: safety and absolute benefit related to coronary risk derived from meta-analysis of randomised trials

被引:278
作者
Sanmuganathan, PS [1 ]
Ghahramani, P [1 ]
Jackson, PR [1 ]
Wallis, EJ [1 ]
Ramsay, LE [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Hallamshire Hosp, Sheffield S10 2JF, S Yorkshire, England
关键词
aspirin; coronary heart disease; primary prevention; meta-analysis;
D O I
10.1136/heart.85.3.265
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective-To determine the cardiovascular and coronary risk thresholds at which aspirin for primary prevention of coronary heart disease is safe and worthwhile. Design-Meta-analysis of four randomised controlled trials of aspirin for primary prevention. The benefit and harm from aspirin treatment were examined to determine: (1) the cardiovascular and coronary risk threshold at which benefit in prevention of myocardial infarction exceeds harm from significant bleeding; and (2) the absolute benefit expressed as number needed to treat (NNT) for aspirin net of cerebral haemorrhage and other bleeding complications at different levels of coronary risk. Main outcome measures-Benefit from aspirin, expressed as reduction in cardiovascular events, myocardial infarctions, strokes, and total mortality; harm caused by aspirin in relation to significant bleeds and major haemorrhages. Results-Aspirin for primary prevention significantly reduced all cardiovascular events by 15% (95% confidence interval (CI) 6% to 22%) and myocardial infarctions by 30% (95% CI 21% to 38%), and non-significantly reduced all deaths by 6% (95% CI -4% to 15%). Aspirin non-significantly increased strokes by 6% (95% CI -24% to 9%) and significantly increased bleeding complications by 69% (95% CI 38% to 107%). The risk of major bleeding balanced the reduction in cardiovascular events when cardiovascular event risk was 0.22%/year. The upper 95% CI for this estimate suggests that harm from aspirin is unlikely to outweigh benefit provided the cardiovascular event risk is 0.8%/year, equivalent to a coronary risk of 0.6%/year. At coronary event risk 1.5%/year, the five year NNT was 44 to prevent a myocardial infarction, and 77 to prevent a myocardial infarction net of any important bleeding complication. At coronary event risk l%/year the NNT was 67 to prevent a myocardial infarction, and 182 to prevent a myocardial infarction net of important bleeding. Conclusions-Aspirin treatment for primary prevention is safe and worthwhile at coronary event risk greater than or equal to 1.5%/year; safe but of limited value at coronary risk 1%/year; and unsafe at coronary event risk 0.5%/year. Advice on aspirin for primary prevention requires formal accurate estimation of absolute coronary event risk.
引用
收藏
页码:265 / 271
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Confidence intervals for the number needed to treat [J].
Altman, DG .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 317 (7168) :1309-1312
[2]   COLLABORATIVE OVERVIEW OF RANDOMIZED TRIALS OF ANTIPLATELET THERAPY .1. PREVENTION OF DEATH, MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION, AND STROKE BY PROLONGED ANTIPLATELET THERAPY IN VARIOUS CATEGORIES OF PATIENTS [J].
ALTMAN, R ;
CARRERAS, L ;
DIAZ, R ;
FIGUEROA, E ;
PAOLASSO, E ;
PARODI, JC ;
CADE, JF ;
DONNAN, G ;
EADIE, MJ ;
GAVAGHAN, TP ;
OSULLIVAN, EF ;
PARKIN, D ;
RENNY, JTG ;
SILAGY, C ;
VINAZZER, H ;
ZEKERT, F ;
ADRIAENSEN, H ;
BERTRANDHARDY, JM ;
BRAN, M ;
DAVID, JL ;
DRICOT, J ;
LAVENNEPARDONGE, E ;
LIMET, R ;
LOWENTHAL, A ;
MORIAU, M ;
SCHAPIRA, S ;
SMETS, P ;
SYMOENS, J ;
VERHAEGHE, R ;
VERSTRAETE, M ;
ATALLAH, A ;
BARNETT, H ;
BATISTA, R ;
BLAKELY, J ;
CAIRNS, JA ;
COTE, R ;
CROUCH, J ;
EVANS, G ;
FINDLAY, JM ;
GENT, M ;
LANGLOIS, Y ;
LECLERC, J ;
NORRIS, J ;
PINEO, GF ;
POWERS, PJ ;
ROBERTS, R ;
SCHWARTZ, L ;
SICURELLA, J ;
TAYLOR, W ;
THEROUX, P .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1994, 308 (6921) :81-100
[3]   CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE RISK PROFILES [J].
ANDERSON, KM ;
ODELL, PM ;
WILSON, PWF ;
KANNEL, WB .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 1991, 121 (01) :293-298
[4]  
ARMITAGE P, 1994, STAT METHODS MED RES, V4, P215
[5]  
BAIGENT C, 2000, CLIN EVIDENCE, V3, P65
[6]   Individualizing aspirin therapy for prevention of cardiovascular events [J].
Boissel, JP .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (22) :1949-1950
[7]   DO DOCTORS ACCURATELY ASSESS CORONARY RISK IN THEIR PATIENTS - PRELIMINARY-RESULTS OF THE CORONARY HEALTH ASSESSMENT STUDY [J].
GROVER, SA ;
LOWENSTEYN, I ;
ESREY, KL ;
STEINERT, Y ;
JOSEPH, L ;
ABRAHAMOWICZ, M .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 310 (6985) :975-978
[8]   IDENTIFYING ADULTS AT INCREASED RISK OF CORONARY-DISEASE - HOW WELL DO THE CURRENT CHOLESTEROL GUIDELINES WORK [J].
GROVER, SA ;
COUPAL, L ;
HU, XF .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1995, 274 (10) :801-806
[9]   Effects of intensive blood-pressure lowering and low-dose aspirin in patients with hypertension:: principal results of the hypertension optimal treatment (HOT) randomised trial [J].
Hansson, L ;
Zanchetti, A ;
Carruthers, SG ;
Dahlöf, B ;
Elmfeldt, D ;
Julius, S ;
Ménard, J ;
Rahn, KH ;
Wedel, H ;
Westerling, S .
LANCET, 1998, 351 (9118) :1755-1762
[10]   Prediction of coronary risk for primary prevention of coronary heart disease: a comparison of methods [J].
Haq, IU ;
Ramsay, LE ;
Jackson, PR ;
Wallis, EJ .
QJM-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 92 (07) :379-385