Nucleosome positioning signals in genomic DNA

被引:252
作者
Peckham, Heather E.
Thurman, Robert E.
Fu, Yutao
Stamatoyannopoulos, John A.
Noble, William Stafford
Struhl, Kevin
Weng, Zhiping [1 ]
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Bioinformat Program, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Boston Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Div Med Genet, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[4] Univ Washington, Dept Genome Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[5] Univ Washington, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[6] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Biol Chem & Mol Pharmacol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1101/gr.6101007
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Although histones can form nucleosomes on virtually any genomic sequence, DNA sequences show considerable variability in their binding affinity. We have used DNA sequences of Saccharomyces cerevisiae whose nucleosome binding affinities have been experimentally determined (Yuan et al. 2005) to train a support vector machine to identify the nucleosome formation potential of any given sequence of DNA. The DNA sequences whose nucleosome formation potential are most accurately predicted are those that contain strong nucleosome forming or inhibiting signals and are found within nucleosome length stretches of genomic DNA with continuous nucleosome formation or inhibition signals. We have accurately predicted the experimentally determined nucleosome positions across a well-characterized promoter region of S. cerevisiae and identified strong periodicity within 199 center-aligned mononucleosomes studied recently (Segal et al. 2006) despite there being no periodicity information used to train the support vector machine. Our analysis suggests that only a subset of nucleosomes are likely to be positioned by intrinsic sequence signals. This observation is consistent with the available experimental data and is inconsistent with the proposal of a nucleosome positioning code. Finally, we show that intrinsic nucleosome positioning signals are both more inhibitory and more variable in promoter regions than in open reading frames in S. cerevisiae.
引用
收藏
页码:1170 / 1177
页数:8
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
Alberts B., 2002, Molecular Biology of The Cell, V4th
[2]   Dual role of DNA intrinsic curvature and flexibility in determining nucleosome stability [J].
Anselmi, C ;
Bocchinfuso, G ;
De Santis, P ;
Savino, M ;
Scipioni, A .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1999, 286 (05) :1293-1301
[3]   Naturally occurring nucleosome positioning signals in human exons and introns [J].
Baldi, P ;
Brunak, S ;
Chauvin, Y ;
Krogh, A .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1996, 263 (04) :503-510
[4]   Removal of promoter nucleosomes by disassembly rather than sliding in vivo [J].
Boeger, H ;
Griesenbeck, J ;
Strattan, JS ;
Kornberg, RD .
MOLECULAR CELL, 2004, 14 (05) :667-673
[5]   Nucleosomes unfold completely at a transcriptionally active promoter [J].
Boeger, H ;
Griesenbeck, J ;
Strattan, JS ;
Kornberg, RD .
MOLECULAR CELL, 2003, 11 (06) :1587-1598
[6]   TGGA repeats impair nucleosome formation [J].
Cao, H ;
Widlund, HR ;
Simonsson, T ;
Kubista, M .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1998, 281 (02) :253-260
[7]   DISTINGUISHING BETWEEN MECHANISMS OF EUKARYOTIC TRANSCRIPTIONAL ACTIVATION WITH BACTERIOPHAGE-T7 RNA-POLYMERASE [J].
CHEN, W ;
TABOR, S ;
STRUHL, K .
CELL, 1987, 50 (07) :1047-1055
[8]   Yeast nucleosome DNA pattern:: Deconvolution from genome sequences of S-cerevisiae [J].
Cohanim, AB ;
Kashi, YH ;
Trifonov, EN .
JOURNAL OF BIOMOLECULAR STRUCTURE & DYNAMICS, 2005, 22 (06) :687-693
[9]   Histone acetylation at promoters is differentially affected by specific activators and repressors [J].
Deckert, J ;
Struhl, K .
MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY, 2001, 21 (08) :2726-2735
[10]   DEFINITIONS AND NOMENCLATURE OF NUCLEIC-ACID STRUCTURE PARAMETERS [J].
DICKERSON, RE .
JOURNAL OF BIOMOLECULAR STRUCTURE & DYNAMICS, 1989, 6 (04) :627-634