Hypothetical versus real willingness to pay in the health care sector: results from a field experiment

被引:143
作者
Blumenschein, K [1 ]
Johannesson, M
Yokoyama, KK
Freeman, PR
机构
[1] Univ Kentucky, Coll Pharm, Lexington, KY 40536 USA
[2] Univ Kentucky, Martin Sch Publ Policy & Adm, Lexington, KY 40536 USA
[3] Stockholm Sch Econ, Dept Econ, S-11383 Stockholm, Sweden
[4] Univ Kentucky, Amer Pharm Serv Corp, Frankfort, KY 40536 USA
关键词
willingness to pay; contingent valuation; field experiments; calibration;
D O I
10.1016/S0167-6296(01)00075-3
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We conducted a field experiment comparing hypothetical and red purchase decisions for a pharmacist provided asthma management program among 172 subjects with asthma. Subjects received either a dichotomous choice contingent valuation question or were given the opportunity to actually enroll in the program. Three different prices were used: US$ 15, 40, and 80. In the hypothetical group, 38% of subjects said that they would purchase the good at the stated price, but only 12% of subjects in the real group purchased the good (p = 0.000), We cannot, however, reject the null hypothesis that "definitely sure" hypothetical yes responses, as identified in a follow-up question, correspond to real yes responses, We conclude that the dichotomous choice contingent valuation method overestimates willingness to pay, but that it may be possible to correct for this overestimation by sorting out "definitely sure" yes responses. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:441 / 457
页数:17
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   MEASURING VALUES OF EXTRA-MARKET GOODS - ARE INDIRECT MEASURES BIASED [J].
BISHOP, RC ;
HEBERLEIN, TA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1979, 61 (05) :926-930
[2]   STATISTICAL BIAS FUNCTIONS AND INFORMATIVE HYPOTHETICAL SURVEYS [J].
BLACKBURN, M ;
HARRISON, GW ;
RUTSTROM, EE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1994, 76 (05) :1084-1088
[3]   Experimental results on expressed certainty and hypothetical bias in contingent valuation [J].
Blumenschein, K ;
Johannesson, M ;
Blomquist, GC ;
Liljas, B ;
O'Conor, RM .
SOUTHERN ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1998, 65 (01) :169-177
[4]  
Carson R. T., 1989, Using surveys to value public goods: The contingent valuation method
[5]  
Carter BL, 1997, PHARMACOTHERAPY, V17, P1274
[6]   Using donation mechanisms to value nonuse benefits from public goods [J].
Champ, PA ;
Bishop, RC ;
Brown, TC ;
McCollum, DW .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1997, 33 (02) :151-162
[7]  
Christensen D B, 1999, J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash), V39, P640
[8]  
Christensen D B, 1993, Am Pharm, VNS33, P34
[9]   Unbiased value estimates for environmental goods: A cheap talk design for the contingent valuation method [J].
Cummings, RG ;
Taylor, LO .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1999, 89 (03) :649-665
[10]   Are hypothetical referenda incentive compatible? [J].
Cummings, RG ;
Elliott, S ;
Harrison, GW ;
James, M .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1997, 105 (03) :609-621