Quantitative magnetic resonance (QMR) method for bone and whole-body-composition analysis

被引:208
作者
Taicher, GZ
Tinsley, FC
Reiderman, A
Heiman, ML
机构
[1] Echo Med Syst, Houston, TX 77042 USA
[2] Eli Lilly Res, Indianapolis, IN 46285 USA
关键词
QMR; bone; osteoporosis; body composition; obesity; new technology;
D O I
10.1007/s00216-003-2224-3
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Objective: to evaluate the applicability, precision, and accuracy of the new EchoMRI quantitative magnetic resonance (QMR) method for in-vitro bovine bone analysis and in-vivo whole-body-composition analysis of conscious live mice. Research methods and procedures: bovine tibia bone samples were measured by QMR and dual-energy X-ray adsorptiometry (DEXA). Repeated measures of whole-body composition were made using live and dead mice with different levels of fat by QMR and DEXA and by classic chemical analysis of the mouse carcass. Results: bone-mineral density (BMD) and bone-mineral content (BMC) measured in bovine tibia by QMR and DEXA were highly correlated. Precision of fat and lean measurement in mice was found to be better for QMR than for DEXA. The coefficient of variation (CV) for fat was 0.34-0.71% for QMR compared with 3.06-12.60% for DEXA. Discussion: QMR offers more specific parameters of bone structure than does DEXA. QMR and DEXA did not differ in the total amount of fat detected in live mice but QMR had improved precision. QMR was superior to DEXA in measuring fat in very small mice. Conclusions: in bone tissue there is a strong correlation between hydrogen NMR signal and bone-mineral density as measured by X-ray. QMR provides a very precise, accurate, fast, and easy to use method for determining fat and lean mass of mice without the need for anesthesia. Its ability to detect differences and monitor changes in body composition in mice with great precision should be of great value in characterizing phenotypes and studying drugs affecting obesity.
引用
收藏
页码:990 / 1002
页数:13
相关论文
共 64 条
[21]   MAGNETIC-FIELD DISTRIBUTION IN MODELS OF TRABECULAR BONE [J].
FORD, JC ;
WEHRLI, FW ;
CHUNG, HW .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1993, 30 (03) :373-379
[22]   Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and body composition: Differences between devices and comparison with reference methods [J].
Genton, L ;
Hans, D ;
Kyle, UG ;
Pichard, C .
NUTRITION, 2002, 18 (01) :66-70
[23]   Evaluation of cortical bone by computed tomography [J].
Hangartner, TN ;
Gilsanz, V .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 1996, 11 (10) :1518-1525
[24]  
Hans D, 1993, Eur J Med, V2, P157
[25]  
Heymsfield SB, 1997, ANNU REV NUTR, V17, P527, DOI 10.1146/annurev.nutr.17.1.527
[26]  
HEYMSFIELD SB, 2001, INT TXB OBESITY
[27]   Validation of a high-resolution X-ray computed tomography system to measure murine adipose tissue depot mass in situ and longitudinally [J].
Hildebrandt, AL ;
Kelly-Sullivan, DM ;
Black, SC .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGICAL AND TOXICOLOGICAL METHODS, 2002, 47 (02) :99-106
[28]  
Hipp JA, 1996, J BONE MINER RES, V11, P286
[29]   Magnetic susceptibility measurement of insoluble solids by NMR: Magnetic susceptibility of bone [J].
Hopkins, JA ;
Wehrli, FW .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1997, 37 (04) :494-500
[30]  
JOHNSTON CC, 1981, ORTHOP CLIN N AM, V12, P559