Public accountability in the age of neo-liberal governance

被引:235
作者
Ranson, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Sch Educ, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
关键词
D O I
10.1080/0268093032000124848
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The practices of accountability and the dispositions they have engendered have changed over time since the mid-1970s. It will be argued that following the demise of the age of professional accountability a regime of neo-liberal corporate accountability has dominated the governance of education. The distinctive dimensions of this regime of consumer choice, of contract efficiency, quality, and capital ownership - have been introduced at different times since 1979. While it is possible to periodize their inception it is necessary to see them as, over time, extending and intensifying into a coherent regime of regulation. Thus understanding of the present modes can only be understood by clarifying the historical and political conditions which have shaped them. Nevertheless, possibilities of change may lie in the contradictions of accountability within the regime of governance.
引用
收藏
页码:459 / 480
页数:22
相关论文
共 125 条
[31]  
Ball S. J., 2000, AUSTR ED RES, V27, P1, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03219719, DOI 10.1007/BF03219719]
[32]   EDUCATION MARKETS, CHOICE AND SOCIAL-CLASS - THE MARKET AS A CLASS STRATEGY IN THE UK AND THE USA [J].
BALL, SJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY OF EDUCATION, 1993, 14 (01) :3-19
[33]  
Beetham D., 1994, DEFINING MEASURING D
[34]  
Beetham David., 1999, DEMOCRACY HUMAN RIGH
[35]  
Bohman John., 1996, Public Deliberation
[36]  
Bottery M., 2000, ED POLICY ETHICS
[37]  
BOURDIEU P, 1999, PRACTICAL REASON
[38]  
Coole DianaH., 2000, Negativity and Politics: Dionysus and Dialectics from Kant to Poststructuralism
[39]  
Daniels H., 2001, VYGOTSKY PEDAGOGY
[40]  
Day P., 1987, ACCOUNTABILITIES 5 P