Personal exposure to ultrafine particles

被引:181
作者
Wallace, Lance [1 ]
Ott, Wayne [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
cooking; restaurants; gas stoves; electric stoves; vehicles; tobacco smoke; AIR CHANGE RATES; INDOOR SOURCES; POLLUTANT CONCENTRATIONS; SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS; GAS; FINE; EMISSION; OUTDOOR; NUMBER; MASS;
D O I
10.1038/jes.2009.59
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Personal exposure to ultrafine particles (UFP) can occur while people are cooking, driving, smoking, operating small appliances such as hair dryers, or eating out in restaurants. These exposures can often be higher than outdoor concentrations. For 3 years, portable monitors were employed in homes, cars, and restaurants. More than 300 measurement periods in several homes were documented, along with 25 h of driving two cars, and 22 visits to restaurants. Cooking on gas or electric stoves and electric toaster ovens was a major source of UFP, with peak personal exposures often exceeding 100,000 particles/cm(3) and estimated emission rates in the neighborhood of 10(12) particles/min. Other common sources of high UFP exposures were cigarettes, a vented gas clothes dryer, an air popcorn popper, candles, an electric mixer, a toaster, a hair dryer, a curling iron, and a steam iron. Relatively low indoor UFP emissions were noted for a fireplace, several space heaters, and a laser printer. Driving resulted in moderate exposures averaging about 30,000 particles/cm(3) in each of two cars driven on 17 trips on major highways on the East and West Coasts. Most of the restaurants visited maintained consistently high levels of 50,000-200,000 particles/cm(3) for the entire length of the meal. The indoor/outdoor ratios of size-resolved UFP were much lower than for PM2.5 or PM10, suggesting that outdoor UFP have difficulty in penetrating a home. This in turn implies that outdoor concentrations of UFP have only a moderate effect on personal exposures if indoor sources are present. A time-weighted scenario suggests that for typical suburban nonsmoker lifestyles, indoor sources provide about 47% and outdoor sources about 36% of total daily UFP exposure and in-vehicle exposures add the remainder (17%). However, the effect of one smoker in the home results in an overwhelming increase in the importance of indoor sources (77% of the total). Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology (2011) 21, 20-30; doi: 10.1038/jes.2009.59; published online 20 January 2010
引用
收藏
页码:20 / 30
页数:11
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Relative contribution of outdoor and indoor particle sources to indoor concentrations [J].
Abt, E ;
Suh, HH ;
Catalano, P ;
Koutrakis, P .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 34 (17) :3579-3587
[2]   Characterization of indoor sources of fine and ultrafine particles: a study conducted in a full-scale chamber [J].
Afshari, A ;
Matson, U ;
Ekberg, LE .
INDOOR AIR, 2005, 15 (02) :141-150
[3]   Indoor particles affect vascular function in the aged -: An air filtration-based intervention study [J].
Brauner, Elvira Vaclavik ;
Forchhammer, Lykke ;
Moller, Peter ;
Barregard, Lars ;
Gunnarsen, Lars ;
Afshari, Alireza ;
Wahlin, Peter ;
Glasius, Marianne ;
Dragsted, Lars Ove ;
Basu, Samar ;
Raaschou-Nielsen, Ole ;
Loft, Steffen .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2008, 177 (04) :419-425
[4]   Exposure to ultrafine particles from ambient air and oxidative stress-induced DNA damage [J].
Brauner, Elvira Vaclavik ;
Forchhammer, Lykke ;
Moller, Peter ;
Simonsen, Jacob ;
Glasius, Marianne ;
Wahlin, Peter ;
Raaschou-Nielsen, Ole ;
Loft, Steffen .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2007, 115 (08) :1177-1182
[5]   Ultrafine particles and nitrogen oxides generated by gas and electric cooking [J].
Dennekamp, M ;
Howarth, S ;
Dick, CAJ ;
Cherrie, JW ;
Donaldson, K ;
Seaton, A .
OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2001, 58 (08) :511-516
[6]   Measurements and predictors of on-road ultrafine particle concentrations and associated pollutants in Los Angeles [J].
Fruin, S. ;
Westerdahl, D. ;
Sax, T. ;
Sioutas, C. ;
Fine, P. M. .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2008, 42 (02) :207-219
[7]   The particle detection efficiency of the TSI-3007 condensation particle counter [J].
Hämeri, K ;
Koponen, IK ;
Aalto, PP ;
Kulmala, M .
JOURNAL OF AEROSOL SCIENCE, 2002, 33 (10) :1463-1469
[8]   Contribution from indoor sources to particle number and mass concentrations in residential houses [J].
He, CR ;
Morawska, LD ;
Hitchins, J ;
Gilbert, D .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2004, 38 (21) :3405-3415
[9]   Indoor-outdoor relationships of particle number and mass in four European cities [J].
Hoek, Gerard ;
Kos, Gerard ;
Harrison, Roy M. ;
de Hartog, Jeroen ;
Meliefste, Kees ;
ten Brink, Harry ;
Katsouyanni, Klea ;
Karakatsani, Anna ;
Lianou, Maria ;
Kotronarou, Anastasia ;
Kavouras, Ilias ;
Pekkanen, Juha ;
Vallius, Marko ;
Kulmala, Markku ;
Puustinen, Arto ;
Thomas, Steve ;
Meddings, Claire ;
Ayres, Jon ;
van Wijnen, Joop ;
Hameri, Kaarle .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2008, 42 (01) :156-169
[10]   The effect of opening windows on air change rates in two homes [J].
Howard-Reed, C ;
Wallace, LA ;
Ott, WR .
JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2002, 52 (02) :147-159