Clinical research ethics for critically ill patients: A pandemic proposal

被引:34
作者
Cook, Deborah [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Burns, Karen [4 ]
Finfer, Simon [5 ]
Kissoon, Niranjan [6 ]
Bhagwanjee, Satish [7 ]
Annane, Djillali [8 ]
Sprung, Charles L. [9 ]
Fowler, Rob [4 ]
Latronico, Nicola [10 ]
Marshall, John [4 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Dept Med, Int Forum Acute Care Trialists InFACT Eth Comm, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, Dept Clin Epidemiol, Int Forum Acute Care Trialists InFACT Eth Comm, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada
[3] McMaster Univ, Dept Biostat, Int Forum Acute Care Trialists InFACT Eth Comm, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Interdept Div Crit Care, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Sydney, Dept Intens Care Med, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[6] Univ British Columbia, Dept Pediat, Vancouver, BC V6T 1W5, Canada
[7] Univ Witwatersrand, Dept Intens Care Med, Johannesburg, South Africa
[8] Univ Versailles, Dept Intens Care Med, Garches, France
[9] Hadassah Hebrew Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol & Crit Care Med, Jerusalem, Israel
[10] Univ Brescia, Dept Anesthesia Intens Care & Perioperat Med, Brescia, Italy
关键词
critical care; pandemic; H1N1; influenza; clinical trials; research ethics committee; informed consent; CONSENT;
D O I
10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181cbaff4
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Pandemic H1N1 influenza is projected to be unprecedented in its scope, causing acute critical illness among thousands of young otherwise healthy adults, who will need advanced life support. Rigorous, relevant, timely, and ethical clinical and health services research is crucial to improve their care and outcomes. Studies designed and conducted during a pandemic should be held to the same high methodologic and implementation standards as during other times. However, unique challenges arise with the need to conduct investigations as efficiently as possible, focused on the optimal outcome for the individual patient, while balancing the need for maximal societal benefit. We believe that clinical critical care research during a pandemic must be approached differently from research undertaken under nonemergent circumstances. We propose recommendations to clinical investigators and research ethics committees regarding clinical and health services research on pandemic-related critical illness. We also propose strategies such as expedited and centralized research ethics committee reviews and alternate consent models. (Crit Care Med 2010; 38[Suppl.]: e138-e142)
引用
收藏
页码:E138 / E142
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Using patient-identifiable data for observational research and audit - Overprotection could damage the public interest
    Al-Shahi, R
    Warlow, C
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 321 (7268): : 1031 - 1032
  • [2] The effect of waiving consent on enrollment in a sepsis trial
    Annane, D
    Outin, H
    Fisch, C
    Bellissant, E
    [J]. INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2004, 30 (02) : 321 - 324
  • [3] Reforming research ethics committees - Latest proposals are a missed opportunity for a radical review
    Ashcroft, RE
    Newson, AJ
    Benn, PMW
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 331 (7517): : 587 - 588
  • [4] Research without consent: Current status, 2003
    Biros, MH
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2003, 42 (04) : 550 - 564
  • [5] The 'Consent to Research' paradigm in critical care: challenges and potential solutions
    Burns, Karen E. A.
    Zubrinich, Celia
    Marshall, John
    Cook, Deborah
    [J]. INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2009, 35 (10) : 1655 - 1658
  • [6] Randomized trials in vulnerable populations
    Cook, Deborah
    Moore-Cox, Anne
    Xavier, Denis
    Lauzier, Francois
    Roberts, Ian
    [J]. CLINICAL TRIALS, 2008, 5 (01) : 61 - 69
  • [7] Research ethics committees in Europe: trials and tribulations
    Druml, Christiane
    Wolzt, M.
    Pleiner, J.
    Singer, E. A.
    [J]. INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2009, 35 (09) : 1636 - 1640
  • [8] Finfer S, 2004, NEW ENGL J MED, V350, P2247
  • [9] Intensive versus Conventional Glucose Control in Critically Ill Patients
    Finfer, S.
    Blair, D.
    Bellomo, R.
    McArthur, C.
    Mitchell, I.
    Myburgh, J.
    Norton, R.
    Potter, J.
    Chittock, D.
    Dhingra, V.
    Foster, D.
    Cook, D.
    Dodek, P.
    Hebert, P.
    Henderson, W.
    Heyland, D.
    McDonald, E.
    Ronco, J.
    Schweitzer, L.
    Peto, R.
    Sandercock, P.
    Sprung, C.
    Young, J. D.
    Su, S.
    Heritier, S.
    Li, Q.
    Bompoint, S.
    Billot, L.
    Crampton, L.
    Darcy, F.
    Jayne, K.
    Kumarasinghe, V.
    Little, L.
    McEvoy, S.
    MacMahon, S.
    Pandey, S.
    Ryan, S.
    Shukla, R.
    Vijayan, B.
    Atherton, S.
    Bell, J.
    Hadfield, L.
    Hourigan, C.
    McArthur, C.
    Newby, L.
    Simmonds, C.
    Buhr, H.
    Eccleston, M.
    McGuinness, S.
    Parke, R.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2009, 360 (13) : 1283 - 1297
  • [10] Research ethics review: Do it once and do it well
    Hebert, Paul
    Saginur, Raphael
    [J]. CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2009, 180 (06) : 597 - 597