Outcome instruments for the assessment of the upper extremity following trauma: a review

被引:103
作者
Dowrick, AS [1 ]
Gabbe, BJ [1 ]
Williamson, OD [1 ]
Cameron, PA [1 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Prevent Med, Alfred Hosp, Cent & Eastern Clin Sch, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
来源
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED | 2005年 / 36卷 / 04期
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
orthopaedic; outcome assessment; upper extremity trauma;
D O I
10.1016/j.injury.2004.06.014
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100602 [中西医结合临床];
摘要
Orthopaedic injuries are common among trauma patients and can result in long-term problems. Considerable data are available regarding functional outcomes following lower extremity trauma. There is, however, a paucity of data available for upper extremity trauma patients. Whilst currently available instruments appear to assess outcomes of relevance in trauma populations, the reliability, validity and responsiveness of these instruments have not been evaluated in the upper extremity trauma population. This paper reviews instruments designed for patient self-evaluation of musculosketetal, disorders of the upper extremity, and instruments used in an orthopaedic trauma population to assess functional recovery following injury. The Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (MFA), Short Muscutoskeletal Functional. Assessment (SMFA), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Scale (ASES-s), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Elbow Scale (ASES-e), Patient Rated Elbow Evaluation (PREE), and the Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) were reviewed. Until research is published outlining the evaluation of assessment instruments in upper extremity orthopaedic populations, authors wilt need to conduct their own validation studies before investigating outcomes in specific trauma populations. (c) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:468 / 476
页数:9
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]
A new approach to the analysis of multiple injuries using data from a national trauma registry [J].
Aharonson-Daniel, L ;
Boyko, V ;
Ziv, A ;
Avitzour, M ;
Peleg, K .
INJURY PREVENTION, 2003, 9 (02) :156-162
[2]
The "Gull sign" - A harbinger of failure for internal fixation of geriatric acetabular fractures [J].
Anglen, JO ;
Burd, TA ;
Hendricks, KJ ;
Harrison, P .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2003, 17 (09) :625-634
[3]
[Anonymous], AM HER DICT ENGL LAN
[4]
[Anonymous], 2000, Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice
[5]
The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire - Reliability and validity of the Swedish version evaluated in 176 patients [J].
Atroshi, I ;
Gummesson, C ;
Andersson, B ;
Dahlgren, E ;
Johansson, A .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 2000, 71 (06) :613-618
[6]
Assessing the reliability and responsiveness of 5 shoulder questionnaires [J].
Beaton, D ;
Richards, RR .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 1998, 7 (06) :565-572
[7]
Beaton D E, 2001, J Hand Ther, V14, P128
[8]
Measuring function of the shoulder - A cross-sectional comparison of five questionnaires [J].
Beaton, DE ;
Richards, RR .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1996, 78A (06) :882-890
[9]
BEATON DE, 2003, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, V413, P90
[10]
Incidence of hardware-related pain and its effect on functional outcomes after open reduction and internal fixation of ankle fractures [J].
Brown, OL ;
Dirschl, DR ;
Obremskey, WT .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2001, 15 (04) :271-274