The TAR effect: When the ones who dislike become the ones who are disliked

被引:62
作者
Gawronski, Bertram [1 ]
Walther, Eva [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Psychol, Social Sci Ctr, London, ON N6A 5C2, Canada
[2] Univ Trier, D-54286 Trier, Germany
关键词
attitude formation; cognitive balance; implicit measures; persuasion; transference;
D O I
10.1177/0146167208318952
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Four studies tested whether a source's evaluations of other individuals can recursively transfer to the source, such that people who like others acquire a positive valence, whereas people who dislike others acquire a negative valence (Transfer of Attitudes Recursively; TAR). Experiment 1 provides first evidence for TAR effects, showing recursive transfers of evaluations regardless of whether participants did or did not have prior knowledge about the (dis) liking source. Experiment 2 shows that previously but not subsequently acquired knowledge about targets that were (dis) liked by a source overrode TAR effects in a manner consistent with cognitive balance. Finally, Experiments 3 and 4 demonstrate that TAR effects are mediated by higher order propositional inferences (in contrast to lower order associative processes), in that TAR effects on implicit attitude measures were fully mediated by TAR effects on explicit attitude measures. Commonalities and differences between the TAR effect and previously established phenomena are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:1276 / 1289
页数:14
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Cognition in persuasion:: An analysis of information processing in response to persuasive communications [J].
Albarracín, D .
ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 34, 2002, 34 :61-130
[2]   MY ENEMYS ENEMY IS MY FRIEND [J].
ARONSON, E ;
COPE, V .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1968, 8 (1P1) :8-&
[3]   CONTINGENCY AWARENESS IN EVALUATIVE CONDITIONING - A CASE FOR UNAWARE AFFECTIVE-EVALUATIVE LEARNING [J].
BAEYENS, F ;
EELEN, P ;
VANDENBERGH, O .
COGNITION & EMOTION, 1990, 4 (01) :3-18
[4]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[5]   When expertise backfires: Contrast and assimilation effects in persuasion [J].
Bohner, G ;
Ruder, M ;
Erb, HP .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 41 :495-519
[6]   Spontaneous trait associations and the case of the superstitious banana [J].
Brown, RD ;
Bassili, JN .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 38 (01) :87-92
[7]  
Cacioppo J T, 1997, Pers Soc Psychol Rev, V1, P3, DOI 10.1207/s15327957pspr0101_2
[8]   Linking versus thinking: Evidence for the different associative and attributional bases of spontaneous trait transference and spontaneous trait inference [J].
Carlston, DE ;
Skowronski, JJ .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 89 (06) :884-898
[9]  
Chen S, 1999, DUAL-PROCESS THEORIES IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, P73
[10]   Limiting the spread of spontaneous trait transference [J].
Crawford, Matthew T. ;
Skowronski, John J. ;
Stiff, Chris .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 43 (03) :466-472