A consensus support system model for group decision-making problems with multigranular linguistic preference relations

被引:532
作者
Herrera-Viedma, E [1 ]
Martínez, L
Mata, F
Chiclana, F
机构
[1] Univ Granada, Dept Comp Sci & Artificial Intelligence, E-18071 Granada, Spain
[2] Univ Jaen, Dept Comp Sci, Jaen 23700, Spain
[3] De Montfort Univ, Ctr Computat Intelligence, Sch Comp, Leicester LE1 9BH, Leics, England
关键词
consensus; fuzzy preference relation; group decision-making (GDM); linguistic modeling;
D O I
10.1109/TFUZZ.2005.856561
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The group decision-making framework with linguistic preference relations is studied. In this context, we assume that there exist several experts who may have different background and knowledge to solve a particular problem and, therefore, different linguistic term sets (multigranular linguistic information) could be used to express their opinions. The aim of this paper is to present a model of consensus support system to assist the experts in all phases of the consensus reaching process of group decision-making problems with multigranular linguistic preference relations. This consensus support system model is based on i) a multigranular linguistic. methodology, ii) two consensus criteria, consensus degrees and proximity measures, and iii) a guidance advice system. The multigranular linguistic methodology permits the unification of the different linguistic domains to facilitate the calculus of consensus degrees and proximity measures on the basis of experts' opinions. The consensus degrees assess the agreement amongst all the experts' opinions, while the proximity measures are used to find out how far the individual opinions are from the group opinion. The guidance advice system integrated in the consensus support system model acts as a feedback mechanism, and it is based on a set of advice rules to help the experts change their opinions and to find out which direction that change should follow in order to obtain the highest degree of consensus possible. There are two main advantages provided by this model of consensus support system. Firstly, its ability to cope with group decision-making problems with multigranular linguistic preference relations, and, secondly, the figure of the moderator, traditionally presents in the consensus reaching process, is replaced by the guidance advice system, and in such a way, the whole group decision-making process is automated.
引用
收藏
页码:644 / 658
页数:15
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1992, LECT NOTES ECON M, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-46768-4_5
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1996, FUZZY SET THEORY ITS
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1986, Uncertainty In Artificial Intelligence, DOI DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.09.005
[4]   A linguistic modeling of consensus in group decision making based on OWA operators [J].
Bordogna, G ;
Fedrizzi, M ;
Pasi, G .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART A-SYSTEMS AND HUMANS, 1997, 27 (01) :126-132
[5]   Group decision-making and the analytic hierarchy process: Exploring the consensus-relevant information content [J].
Bryson, N .
COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1996, 23 (01) :27-35
[6]   CONSENSUS IN DISTRIBUTED SOFT ENVIRONMENTS [J].
CARLSSON, C ;
EHRENBERG, D ;
EKLUND, P ;
FEDRIZZI, M ;
GUSTAFSSON, P ;
LINDHOLM, P ;
MERKURYEVA, G ;
RIISSANEN, T ;
VENTRE, AGS .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1992, 61 (1-2) :165-185
[7]   DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS FOR ILL-STRUCTURED PROBLEMS - AN EMPIRICAL-STUDY [J].
CATSBARIL, WL ;
HUBER, GP .
DECISION SCIENCES, 1987, 18 (03) :350-372
[8]   Deriving consensus in multiagent systems [J].
Ephrati, E ;
Rosenschein, JS .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 1996, 87 (1-2) :21-74
[9]  
Fedrizzi M, 1999, INT J INTELL SYST, V14, P63, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1098-111X(199901)14:1<63::AID-INT5>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-S