Cluster randomized trials of professional and organizational behavior change interventions in health care settings

被引:13
作者
Grimshaw, J [1 ]
Eccles, M
Campbell, M
Elbourne, D
机构
[1] Ottawa Hlth Res Inst, Clin Epidemiol Program, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Ottawa, Dept Med, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
[3] Newcastle Univ, Sch Populat & Hlth Sci, Ctr Hlth Serv Res, Clin Effectiveness Res Program, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, Tyne & Wear, England
[4] Univ Aberdeen, Hlth Serv Res Unit, Aberdeen AB9 1FX, Scotland
[5] Univ London London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Med Stat Unit, London WC1E 7HT, England
[6] Univ London, Inst Educ, Social Sci Res Unit, EPPI Ctr,Program Systemat Reviews Educ, London WC1E 7HU, England
关键词
cluster randomized trials; implementation research; interventions; dissemination and implementation interventions; COmputerised Guidelines Evaluation in the NorTh; of England (COGENT);
D O I
10.1177/0002716205274576
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Individual patient randomized trials are the gold standard for assessing the effects of health care evaluations. However, individual randomization may not be possible for practical, logistical, ethical, or political reasons, for example, when evaluating health care professional and organizational behavior change interventions. Under such circumstances, cluster randomized trials are commonly used. This article discusses the practical and ethical issues in the design, conduct, and analysis of cluster randomized trials of professional behavior and organizational change strategies using examples from two primary studies evaluating health care provider behavior,hang, strategies. Cluster randomized trials are commonly used in health care. They raise distinct ethical and methodological issues that have rarely been adequately addressed in studies to date.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 93
页数:23
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]   Evidence of self-report bias in assessing adherence to guidelines [J].
Adams, AS ;
Soumerai, SB ;
Lomas, J ;
Ross-Degnan, D .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 1999, 11 (03) :187-192
[2]  
Adams P, 1996, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V312, P827
[3]  
Anderson J, 1996, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V312, P762
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2002, PRINCIPLE BEST PRACT
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1957, EXPT DESIGN
[6]   A COMPARISON OF RESULTS OF METAANALYSES OF RANDOMIZED CONTROL TRIALS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF CLINICAL EXPERTS - TREATMENTS FOR MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION [J].
ANTMAN, EM ;
LAU, J ;
KUPELNICK, B ;
MOSTELLER, F ;
CHALMERS, TC .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1992, 268 (02) :240-248
[7]  
Baker R, 2000, BRIT J GEN PRACT, V50, P655
[8]  
Campbell M, 2000, J Health Serv Res Policy, V5, P12
[9]   CONSORT statement: extension to cluster randomised trials [J].
Campbell, MK ;
Elbourne, DR ;
Altman, DG .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 328 (7441) :702-708
[10]  
Campbell MK, 2001, STAT MED, V20, P391, DOI 10.1002/1097-0258(20010215)20:3<391::AID-SIM800>3.0.CO