Conditional weighted residuals (CWRES): A model diagnostic for the FOCE method

被引:299
作者
Hooker, Andrew C. [1 ]
Staatz, Christine E. [1 ]
Karlsson, Mats O. [1 ]
机构
[1] Uppsala Univ, Dept Pharmaceut Biosci, Fac Pharm, Div Pharmacokinet & Drug Therapy, S-75124 Uppsala, Sweden
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
conditional estimation; model diagnostics; modeling; non-linear mixed effect models; NONMEM; pharmacometrics; statistics; weighted residuals;
D O I
10.1007/s11095-007-9361-x
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Purpose. Population model analyses have shifted from using the first order (FO) to the first-order with conditional estimation (FOCE) approximation to the true model. However, the weighted residuals (WRES), a common diagnostic tool used to test for model misspecification, are calculated using the FO approximation. Utilizing WRES with the FOCE method may lead to misguided model development/evaluation. We present a new diagnostic tool, the conditional weighted residuals (CWRES), which are calculated based on the FOCE approximation. Materials and Methods. CWRES are calculated as the FOCE approximated difference between an individual's data and the model prediction of that data divided by the root of the covariance of the data given the model. Results. Using real and simulated data the CWRES distributions behave as theoretically expected under the correct model. In contrast, in certain circumstances, the WRES have distributions that greatly deviate from the expected, falsely indicating model misspecification. CWRES/WRES comparisons can also indicate if the FOCE estimation method will improve the results of an FO model fit to data. Conclusions. Utilization of CWRES could improve model development and evaluation and give a more accurate picture of if and when a model is misspecified when using the FO or FOCE methods.
引用
收藏
页码:2187 / 2197
页数:11
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Role of modelling and simulation in Phase I drug development [J].
Aarons, L ;
Karlsson, MO ;
Mentré, F ;
Rombout, F ;
Steimer, JL ;
van Peer, A .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 2001, 13 (02) :115-122
[2]  
Abramowitz M, 1972, HDB MATH FUNCTIONAL
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1999, FED REGISTER, V64, P6663
[4]   THE NONMEM SYSTEM [J].
BEAL, S ;
SHEINER, L .
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 1980, 34 (02) :118-119
[5]  
BEAL SL, 1992, NONMEM USERS GUIDE
[6]   A comparison of a Bayesian population method with two methods as implemented in commercially available software [J].
Bennett, JE ;
Wakefield, JC .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACOKINETICS AND BIOPHARMACEUTICS, 1996, 24 (04) :403-432
[7]   Considerations in analyzing single-trough concentrations using mixed-effects modeling [J].
Booth, BP ;
Gobburu, JVS .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2003, 43 (12) :1307-1315
[8]  
Davidian M., 1995, NONLINEAR MODELS REP
[9]  
Galecki Andrzej T, 2004, J Biopharm Stat, V14, P483, DOI 10.1081/BIP-120037194
[10]  
GIRARD P, 2005, PAGE ABSTR ANN M POP, V14