Echo-enhanced color- and power-Doppler EUS for the discrimination between focal pancreatitis and pancreatic carcinoma

被引:130
作者
Becker, D [1 ]
Strobel, D [1 ]
Bernatik, T [1 ]
Hahn, EG [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Dept Med 1, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1067/mge.2001.115007
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: EUS is a precise method for detection and staging of pancreatic tumors. However, differentiation between inflammatory pseudotumor and pancreatic carcinoma remains difficult. The aim of this study was to evaluate contrast-enhanced EUS as a method of differentiating inflammation and carcinoma based on perfusion characteristics. Methods: Patients with solid pancreatic masses underwent EUS with a linear echoendoscope. Perfusion in the pancreatic tissue and the mass was assessed with native and contrast-enhanced EUS with power- and color-Doppler imaging. Examinations were evaluated by a blinded reader. A markedly hyperperfused lesion was considered an inflammatory pseudotumor whereas lesions that were hypoperfused compared with surrounding tissue were considered to be carcinoma. Results: Fifteen of 23 patients had hypoperfusion within the mass and 8 patients had hyperperfused lesions. Of the 15 patients with hypoperfused masses, all had pancreatic adenocarcinoma; 1 of 8 patients with a hyperperfused lesion also had adenocarcinoma. The remaining 7 patients had focal inflammation. Sensitivity for differentiation of pancreatic carcinoma versus inflammatory changes was 94%, specificity 100%. Conclusion: Echo-enhanced power-Doppler EUS reliably differentiates pancreatic neoplasm and focal pancreatitis. The diagnostic accuracy of this technique is comparable to CT, magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography, and ERCP.
引用
收藏
页码:784 / 789
页数:6
相关论文
共 34 条
[11]   PANCREATIC-CANCER VERSUS CHRONIC-PANCREATITIS - DIAGNOSIS WITH CA 19-9 ASSESSMENT, US, CT, AND CT-GUIDED FINE-NEEDLE BIOPSY [J].
DELMASCHIO, A ;
VANZULLI, A ;
SIRONI, S ;
CASTRUCCI, M ;
MELLONE, R ;
STAUDACHER, C ;
CARLUCCI, M ;
ZERBI, A ;
PAROLINI, D ;
FARAVELLI, A ;
CANTABONI, A ;
GARANCINI, P ;
DICARLO, V .
RADIOLOGY, 1991, 178 (01) :95-99
[12]   Pancreatic cancer: Value of dual-phase helical CT in assessing resectability [J].
Diehl, SJ ;
Lehmann, KJ ;
Sadick, M ;
Lachmann, R ;
Georgi, M .
RADIOLOGY, 1998, 206 (02) :373-378
[13]   Chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic carcinoma [J].
Evans, JD ;
Morton, DG ;
Neoptolemos, JP .
POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 73 (863) :543-548
[14]  
FURUKAWA T, 1994, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V89, P2038
[15]  
Harrison JL, 1999, AM SURGEON, V65, P659
[16]   Pancreatic carcinoma versus chronic pancreatitis: Dynamic MR imaging [J].
Johnson, PT ;
Outwater, EK .
RADIOLOGY, 1999, 212 (01) :213-218
[17]   Efficiency of percutaneous core biopsy in pancreatic tumor diagnosis [J].
Karlson, BM ;
Forsman, CA ;
Wilander, E ;
Skogseid, B ;
Lindgren, PG ;
Jacobson, G ;
Rastad, J .
SURGERY, 1996, 120 (01) :75-79
[18]   ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASONOGRAPHY IN THE DIFFERENTIAL-DIAGNOSIS OF PANCREATIC DISEASE [J].
KAUFMAN, AR ;
SIVAK, MV .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1989, 35 (03) :214-219
[19]   Diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma: Role of FDG PET [J].
Keogan, MT ;
Tyler, D ;
Clark, L ;
Branch, MS ;
McDermott, VG ;
DeLong, DM ;
Coleman, RE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1998, 171 (06) :1565-1570
[20]  
KIM K, 1990, INT J PANCREATOL, V7, P61