The scent of death: Chemosensory assessment of predation risk by prey animals

被引:1171
作者
Kats, LB [1 ]
Dill, LM
机构
[1] Pepperdine Univ, Div Nat Sci, Malibu, CA 90263 USA
[2] Simon Fraser Univ, Dept Biol Sci, Behav Ecol Res Grp, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada
来源
ECOSCIENCE | 1998年 / 5卷 / 03期
关键词
predator-prey; chemical cues; antipredator behaviour; morphological defenses; life-history adaptation;
D O I
10.1080/11956860.1998.11682468
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
It is well documented that animals take risk of predation into account when making decisions about how to behave in particular situations, often trading-off risk against opportunities for mating or acquiring energy. Such an ability implies that animals have reliable information about the risk of predation at a given place and lime. Chemosensory cues are an important source of such information. They reliably reveal the presence of predators (or their presence in the immediate past) and may also provide information on predator activity level and diet. In certain circumstances (e.g., in the dark, for animals in hiding) they may be the only cues available. Although a vast literature exists on the responses of prey to predator chemosensory cues (or odours), these studies are widely scattered, from marine biology to biological control, and not well known or appreciated by behavioural ecologists. In this paper, we provide an exhaustive review of this literature, primarily in tabular form. We highlight some of the more representative examples in the text, and discuss some ecological and evolutionary aspects of the use of chemosensory information for prey decision making. Curiously, only one example illustrates the ability of birds to detect predator odours and we have found no examples for terrestrial insects, suggesting a fruitful area for future study.
引用
收藏
页码:361 / 394
页数:34
相关论文
共 416 条
[1]  
ABBOTT DH, 1990, CHEM SIGNAL, V5, P599
[2]  
ALDERDICE DF, 1954, PROGR REPORT PACIFIC, V98, P10
[3]   PREDATOR AVOIDANCE BY THE FRESH-WATER SNAIL PHYSELLA-VIRGATA IN RESPONSE TO THE CRAYFISH PROCAMBARUS-SIMULANS [J].
ALEXANDER, JE ;
COVICH, AP .
OECOLOGIA, 1991, 87 (03) :435-442
[4]   RELATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF REPELLENTS FOR REDUCING MULE DEER DAMAGE [J].
ANDELT, WF ;
BURNHAM, KP ;
MANNING, JA .
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1991, 55 (02) :341-347
[5]   RELATIVE PREFERENCE OF CAPTIVE COW ELK FOR REPELLENT-TREATED DIETS [J].
ANDELT, WF ;
BAKER, DL ;
BURNHAM, KP .
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1992, 56 (01) :164-173
[6]   PRESENCE OF SCULPINS (COTTUS-GOBIO) REDUCES DRIFT AND ACTIVITY OF GAMMARUS-PULEX (AMPHIPODA) [J].
ANDERSSON, KG ;
BRONMARK, C ;
HERRMANN, J ;
MALMQVIST, B ;
OTTO, C ;
SJORSTROM, P .
HYDROBIOLOGIA, 1986, 133 (03) :209-215
[7]  
[Anonymous], CHEM SIGNALS VERTEBR
[8]   WATER-BORNE STIMULI RELEASED BY PREDATORY CRABS AND DAMAGED PREY INDUCE MORE PREDATOR-RESISTANT SHELLS IN A MARINE GASTROPOD [J].
APPLETON, RD ;
PALMER, AR .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1988, 85 (12) :4387-4391
[9]   SHEEP FOOD REPELLENTS - EFFICACY OF VARIOUS PRODUCTS, HABITUATION, AND SOCIAL FACILITATION [J].
ARNOULD, C ;
SIGNORET, JP .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ECOLOGY, 1993, 19 (02) :225-236
[10]  
Audesirk T., 1985, The Mollusca, V8, P1