Opinions of personality disorder experts regarding the DSM-IV personality disorders classification system

被引:140
作者
Bernstein, David P. [1 ]
Iscan, Cuneyt [2 ]
Maser, Jack [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maastricht, Dept Clin Physiol Sci, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Massachusetts, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, Amherst, MA 01003 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[4] VA Affairs San Diego Hlthcare Syst, San Diego, CA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1521/pedi.2007.21.5.536
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Objective: To survey the opinions of personality disorder (PD) experts on possible revisions in the classification system for PDs in the DSM-V. Method: Four hundred members of two international associations, the Association for Research on Personality Disorders, and the International Society for the Study of Personality Disorders, were asked to take a 78-item web survey. Results: Of the experts who completed the survey (N = 96), 74% felt that the DSM-lV's categorical system of PD diagnosis should be replaced. Eighty percent felt that PDs are better conceived of as personality dimensions or illness spectra, than as categories. The most frequently endorsed alternative system for PDs was a mixed system of categories and dimensions. Most experts preferred the PDs to remain on Axis II. Only 31.3% wanted the term, "Borderline Personality Disorder," retained in the DSM-V. Conclusions: A clear majority of the PD experts were dissatisfied with the current diagnostic system for PDs.
引用
收藏
页码:536 / 551
页数:16
相关论文
共 60 条
[31]   Two-year prevalence and stability of individual DSM-IV criteria for schizotypal, borderline, avoidant, and obsessive-compulsive personality disorders: Toward a hybrid model of axis II disorders [J].
McGlashan, TH ;
Grilo, CM ;
Sanislow, CA ;
Ralevski, E ;
Morey, LC ;
Gunderson, JG ;
Skodol, AE ;
Shea, MT ;
Zanarini, MC ;
Bender, D ;
Stout, RL ;
Yen, S ;
Pagano, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2005, 162 (05) :883-889
[32]   Reflections on the future of DSM Axis II [J].
Millon, T .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY DISORDERS, 2000, 14 (01) :30-41
[33]  
Millon T., 1996, Disorders of personality
[34]   Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders [J].
Mittal, Vijay A. ;
Walker, Elaine F. .
PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2011, 189 (01) :158-159
[35]   The relationship among three models of personality psychopathology: DSM-III-R personality disorder, TCI scores and DSQ defences [J].
Mulder, RT ;
Joyce, PR ;
Sullivan, PF ;
Bulik, CM ;
Carter, FA .
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 1999, 29 (04) :943-951
[36]  
Nehls N, 1998, Issues Ment Health Nurs, V19, P97, DOI 10.1080/016128498249105
[37]   Charting the future of Axis II [J].
Oldham, JM ;
Skodol, AE .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY DISORDERS, 2000, 14 (01) :17-29
[38]   Neurobiological dimensional models of personality: A review of the models of Cloninger, Depue, and Siever [J].
Paris, J .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY DISORDERS, 2005, 19 (02) :156-170
[39]   The classification of personality disorders should be booted in biology [J].
Paris, J .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY DISORDERS, 2000, 14 (02) :127-136
[40]  
Pincus AL., 1990, J Personal Disord, V4, P342, DOI DOI 10.1521/PEDI.1990.4.4.342