Culture and context: East Asian American and European American differences in P3 event-related potentials and self-construal

被引:83
作者
Lewis, Richard S. [1 ]
Goto, Sharon G. [1 ]
Kong, Lauren L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Pomona Coll, Dept Psychol, Claremont, CA 91711 USA
关键词
cross-cultural differences; collectivism; individualism; interdependent self-construal; independent self-construal; event-related potentials;
D O I
10.1177/0146167207313731
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Research has demonstrated differences in social and cognitive processes between East Asians and European Americans. Whereas East Asians have been characterized as being more sensitive to situational context and attending more to the perceptual field, European Americans have been characterized as being more focused on the object and being more field independent. The goal of the present experiment was to investigate differences in neural responses to target objects and stimulus context between East Asian Americans and European Americans using a three-stimulus novelty P3 event-related potential design. As hypothesized, European Americans displayed relatively greater target P3 amplitudes, indexing attention to target events, whereas East Asian Americans displayed relatively greater novelty P3 amplitudes, indexing attention to contextually deviant events. Furthermore, the authors found that interdependent self-construal mediated the relationship between culture and the novelty P3. These findings identify a specific pattern of neural activity associated with established cultural differences in contextual sensitivity.
引用
收藏
页码:623 / 634
页数:12
相关论文
共 53 条
[21]   Cultural differences in neural function associated with object processing [J].
Gutchess, Angela H. ;
Welsh, Robert C. ;
Boduroglu, Aysecan ;
Park, Denise C. .
COGNITIVE AFFECTIVE & BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2006, 6 (02) :102-109
[22]   Mechanisms of human attention: event-related potentials and oscillations [J].
Herrmann, CS ;
Knight, RT .
NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2001, 25 (06) :465-476
[23]  
Hofstede G., 1991, Cultures and organizations, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0005-7967(02)00184-5
[24]   Culture, control, and perception of relationships in the environment [J].
Ji, LJ ;
Peng, KP ;
Nisbett, RE .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 78 (05) :943-955
[25]  
Johnson R., 1988, ADV PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, V3, P69, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1993.tb03208.x
[26]   Stimulus context determines P3a and P3b [J].
Katayama, J ;
Polich, J .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1998, 35 (01) :23-33
[27]   Deviance or uniqueness, harmony or conformity? A cultural analysis [J].
Kim, H ;
Markus, HR .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 77 (04) :785-800
[28]   We talk, therefore we think? A cultural analysis of the effect of talking on thinking [J].
Kim, HS .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 83 (04) :828-842
[29]   Perceiving an object and its context in different cultures: A cultural look at New Look [J].
Kitayama, S ;
Duffy, S ;
Kawamura, T ;
Larsen, JT .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2003, 14 (03) :201-206
[30]  
KITAYAMA S, 2004, CULTURE COMPETENCE C, P55